Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Pay and promotional disparity in BSF compared to armed forces



World's largest para-military organisation, Border Security Force (BSF) suffers from highest attrition for quite a while. Experts cite reasons like low promotional avenues along with pay disparity in relation to their armed forces counterparts after the implementation of the Sixth pay commission report for the high attrition rate in the BSF. Every month at least 350-400 BSF jawans and officers seek premature retirement of which Rajasthan Frontier has not been far behind.

A BSF source said the Centre does not realise the challenges our jawans and officers face every day while protecting the 7,000 km long border adjoining Pakistan and Bangladesh. "During 30-35 years of career, a BSF person could manage to stay not more than a few days with his family and the promotional avenues in comparison to the army personnel, it has been frustrating for them," said a source.

According to an available data more than 900 jawans and officers from the Rajasthan Frontier alone left the job during October 1, 2008 to September 30 ,2009. The data released by BSF headquarters at New Delhi reads that in 2008 alone at least 4,400 people left the job while till June 2009, it has crossed 2,600 at the all-India level from the organisation.

As the data reveals most of the personnel leave the job after completing 20 years in service just to take post retirement benefits while almost 40% of them leave the organisation well before 20 years of service on account of low wages, promotional avenues and tough living conditions and service conditions.

A retired director general BSF, M L Kumavat, accepted the fact of high attrition rate in the BSF but said "The trend has been arrested after the implementation of the pay commission report." Kumavat believes that not only the service conditions and pay disparity have not been the reasons for high attrition. "People leave the job as they get lucrative offers from the private sectors and also family pressures and responsibility plays its role," added Kumavat.

Kumavat accepted the fact that a constable in the BSF takes at least 20 years to be promoted to head constable while a similar rank in the Army needs 7-8 years to reach that level. Similarly, a second command officer in the BSF have not been included in the pay band 4 (P4) while his counterparts Lt colonel has been included.

Agrees P S Nayar, general secretary, All India Central Para Military Forces and Services Welfare Association, who said "The difference between the salary of a jawan in BSF and Army is of at least Rs 5,000 a month meanwhile the difference goes up to Rs 22,000 in case of higher ranks. This disparity does more harm than good so far moral of BSF is concerned."
Source:The Times of India

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

This seems to be a biased opinion. For one, leaving the BSF is far far easier than quitting the army - so figures are not comparable (Although no equivalent figures are given for the army). Secondly, Lt Col in the army is not necessarily the second-in-command - most often Lt Col is the CO - Lt Col in the Army being merely a rank and not an appointment! Moreover, the role of the BSF / CPMF and Army is JUST NOT COMAPRABLE!! In Fact, it is high time we stopped comparing Army with any other service and for a change give due regard to ALL OUR ARMED FORCES INCLUDING CPMF/ BSF AND POLICE. (Why was Army required for rescue ops of a rail accident at Mathura on 21 October 2009?)PLEASE DO NOT POST SUCH BIASED ARTICLES!!!

Anonymous said...

I agree with Anonymous. Noeadays it seems to be fashion to berate army while calling upon them for all sorts of civilian functions. Time to listen to the voice of aam aadmi.
A Concerned Citizen.

Anonymous said...

hey, why d fuss? army is ARMY & bsf is bsf

Anonymous said...

There is no comparision between a Army Lt Col and a BSF 2I/C --- Please do not REPEAT do not go on shoulder rank badges ----- a Lt Col has always been equivalent to a para military commandant and continues to remain so. The only difference is that earlier the 2nd in command or the 2I/c was wearing a Ashoka as his shoulder rank badge and now a star has been added to it but this additional star does not bring him at par with the armt Lt Col who continues to command a unit in Army and their equivalent in Navy and Air Force, where as a 2I/c despite that additional star on the shoulder is still a 2nd in command.So please get your facts right

Anonymous said...

Well! I agree that service conditions in BSF are difficult, but so is with Army. It is unfair to compare service conditions of BSF with Army...or for that matter with that of any two services. Even in Armed forces, Air Force is relatively more better of and comfortable as compared to the other two services. That does not mean we start introspecting with lens and demand parity in pay and service conditions.
So let us get mature and demand what we deserve extending logic of our own and do not make fool of ourselves in the hands of babus.

Anonymous said...

It is the fact that the BSF and CRPF personnel do not get their due in comparision to armed forces. Only the combatent in the armed forces face hardships but rest all enjoy their life with drink and dance... and keep fighting for their equavalance with civil counterparts.

Anonymous said...

There is no doubt that BSF is performing is very hard duty, a BSF person has to remain stand on the international border front of counterpart which is called ACTIVE DUTY, but usually army performs the duties in the mid cities and a soldier of ARMY tender his job after 15 yrs and perhaphs throughout his service he would have not seen the border.I want to say that when a bullet hits a soldier it never sees whether an army person is killed or a BSF person is killed. Disparity in income only proves that life of an BSF person cheap as compared to army man which is not justifiable.

Brajesh said...

Its not understood as to why people in the name of anonymous overreact towards genuine cause of BSF.well G'leman "anonymous" what BSF is asking for itself,is affecting u.U may well claim high for Army, Air Force or Navy.I respect yr concern but please don't disrespect somebody's else concern.The colour of our "lanyard" may be different from yours however our conviction,dedication & sacrifice towards the country is no less than yours,rather in few aspects more than yours.So calm down yr anxities & worries.U asked for yr self ,u got it.Allow us to putforth our point.Learn to respect others as well.Good Luck

Amit said...

Well this is true that we don't want to be compared with indian army who left the post and in the name of cold or ice then again fighting a war just to reclaim the own land suffring the casualties and showing that how heroic act was at the same time all the LC where BSF was deployed not a single inch were encroched by intrudes so this the diffrence between them and us i believe Lt Col is merely a rank only in army because of deployment in peace posting or way behind the borders just making fools of our countryman well how many wars our army had fought so far and won for us only one 1971 its better they utilized in accidents as far as mathura accident because they r there only having all sort off material with them its better you start thinking that there are others who are doing agreat job better than you not killing the innocents or brothres officers or doing land scam.

er.mandeepdadhwal said...

there is no need to compare the armed forces with BSF as the question is not who is getting more the problem is BSF personnel are being deprived of what they should be entitled to for example the BEF personnel does ot get any after retirement benefits now for 2004 onwards recruited ppl ,and please officers are well paid and fed in any force and agency its the soldier who gets neglected ... BSF has done a variety of tasks assigned with iutstanding discipline and courage dont post stupid comments disregarding BSF or its current offcrs . it can not b compared and should not be just the problems should be addressed to and solutions be given relieving the sodiers jai hind

Anonymous said...

The very fact BSF is a PARA-MILITARY force, its job is also PARA in nature. If BSF feels so strongly about a raw deal given to them , kindly shift over to ARMY which I m triply sure not even a single officer would like to do so because they are well aware the difficulties involved and the huge amount of previleges they get being only 3 or 4 in number (ie the comdt, dy comdt and the asst comdtthey would nver in life get in army when posted in an infantry battalion where the number of officers is large. BSF must not forget its status and never dream to compare with the million strong Army. It is a known fact that 95% of the BSF officers have faced the SSB to enter the army and once rejected, resorted to join the BSF.

Anonymous said...

Dear we are talking about life and its value..bsf/crpf losing men in fighting against maoists lyk u guys looses in war,u cant say as army is 1 million so bsf should get less pay than army...hold on which planet y hv come frm dude..we are talking about due respect n monetary benefits which should be given to capf people..this is the proof how an idiot can also make it in ssb..

Pankaj said...

The demand of all CPMF is genuine to the best of my knowledge LT. Col is now commanding a company which means a strength of 50 personnel where as a CPMF company is of 120 plus personnel. Army revolted when LT.Col were not included in PB4. Also second in command on average commands a battalion minimum for 3 month or more in a year and due to shortage of officer they are also commanding a battalion. So government should include second in command to PB4 and give more dignity to CPMF officer this difference is more humiliating in organisation like NSG when a newly promoted LT.Col gets more benefit than second in command who may be 6 tears or more in service because of wrong decision

Anonymous said...

one cannot compare the duties done by BSF with any other Armed forces!
Armed forces are much more well facilitated than the inhuman basic condition provided to a BSF constable. It is an accepted truth "BSF is doing difficult duty" by the Army personnel's who have seen & experienced BSF duties live. So better not to compare BSF with Armed forces. Pls give BSF personnel hygiene & healthy living/working condition

yogendrasingh chouhan said...

Dosto miltry aur paramiltry ki salary mai etna difference Kyo h? Pls tell me anyone......

SANTOSH JHA said...

dosto military &paramilitary. ke pay aur wef me antar Nahi hona. chahiye.

LIST OF CGHS HOSPITALS
1. ALLAHABAD 2. AHEMDABAD 3. Bangalore 4. Bhubhaneshwar 5. Bhopal
6. Chandigarh 7. CHENNAI 8. Delhi 9. Dehradun 10. Guwahati
11. Hyderabad 12. Jaipur 13. Jabalpur 14. Kanpur 15. Kolkata
16. Lucknow 17. Meerut 18. Mumbai 19. Nagpur 20. Patna
21. Pune 22. Ranchi 23. Shillong 24. Trivandrum 25. Jammu.
7th CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION NEWS
TITLEDATEARTICLESORDERS
7TH CPC REPORT AND THE NEED FOR TIMELINESS16.04.20147thCPC Blog
DID YOU KNOW HOW THE 6TH CPC MULTIPLICATION FACTOR OF 1.86 WAS DERIVED..?15.04.201490Paisa
EXPECTED PAY STRUCTURE OF 7TH CPC10.04.201490Paisa
Date of submission of 7th CPC Report05.04.2014-Rajya Sabha
Comments and Suggestions on 7th CPC04.04.201490Paisa
A webpage has been created by the Ministry of Finance for 7th Central Pay Commission24.03.2014-Finmin
Federations veiws on the ToR of 7th CPC05.03.2014AIRF/BPMS/IRTSA
Cabinet approved 7th Central Pay Commission Terms of Reference28.02.201490Paisa
Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission04.02.201490Paisa
NO COMPROMISE ON TERMS OF REFERENCE07.12.2013NFPE
Possible ToR meeting with Staff Side JCM-Dopt19.11.2013Dopt
7th CPC Date for implementation11.10.20137thcpcnews
Press Statement of Confederation of 7th CPC25.09.2013Confederation
Consent given by PM for 7th CPC25.09.201390Paisa
RETIREMENT AGE 62
HEADLINESDATEOUR BLOGOTHER BLOGSOTHER MEDIAS
Retirement age of 65: The Politicization of Employees’ Demands11.04.201490Paisa--
Retirement age to 62-What is the background behind this news?01.03.201490Paisa--
50% DA Merger and Retirement age almost disappeared from CG Employees Diary...!07.03.2014-GServants-
High hopes fading due to announcement of election dates...05.03.2014-Karnmk-
Proposals of Retirement age 62 and 50% DA Merger..?01.03.2014-GServants-
Retirement Age 62 - Cabinet expected to clear on Friday (28.202014)26.02.201490Paisa--
Retirement Age 62 – Cabinet is likely to clear some of these demands..!25.02.2014-PCUpdate
Proposal for raising Retirement Age to 62 waits for Cabinet Nod17.02.2014-GServants-
Parliamentary panel urged to raise the retirement age to 65 years08.02.2014--TOI
Retirement Age 62 : Govt not considering to raise retirement age to 6218.08.2013-PTI
Retirement age 62 – No hike in Retirement age of Central Government employees…15.08.2013-CGEN.in-
Retirement Age 62 - Prime Minister likely to declare on his Independence Day speech14.08.2013-CGEN.in-
Retirement Age of High Court Judges23.08.201390Paisa--
Retirement Age 62 – Cabinet decision to increase retirement age deferred03.08.2013--B.Standard
No plan to increase retirement age of employees16.06.2013--PTI
Pros and cons of raising the retirement age of Central Government Employees09.06.2013-EOrders-
No decision on central staff retirement age on cabinet meeting05.06.2013-PCUpdate-
Retirement age to be extended by 2 years to 6204.06.2013--FExpress
Increase retirement age of government employees to 6230.05.2013--ET
Union government wants retirement age 6229.05.2013--Rediff
No proposal to enhance the retirement age from 60 to 62 years08.03.201390Paisa--
Call to increase retirement age of bank employees to 6504.02.2013--Hindu
Retirement age of Central Government Employees20.01.201390Paisa--
Retirement age of faculty doctors from 65 to 70 years…03.12.201290Paisa-
Enhancement of superannuation retirement age of KV teachers31.08.201290Paisa-
Retirement age of Teachers and Lecturers26.08.201290Paisa--
Cabinet today approved the proposal to enhancement of age of superannuation of teachers to 6521.07.2012--PIB
Retirement age across the world - ILC Report10.07.2011--Global
Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed05.09.2010--PTI
PIL on retirement age of civil servants 25.09.2010--PTI

Disclaimer

90 Paisa News : As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post.

All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog.


Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only.

90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Any suggestions write to us
90paisa2008@gmail.com


Related Posts with Thumbnails