Wednesday, June 09, 2010

Central Government Employees Transfer Rates Reviewed in case of A-1/A/B-1 Cities...



No. 19030/3/2008-E.IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Expenditure
***

New Delhi dated the 8th June, 2010

Office Memorandum

Sub: Travelling Allowance Rules - Implementation of the Sixth CPC.

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department's OM of even number dated 23.09.08 on the subject cited above and to say that it has been brought to Government's notice that the issue of this OM has led to lowering of the per km rates for transportation of personal effects by road on transfer in the case of A-1 / A / B-1 class cities. The provision under para 4.C of the said OM has been reviewed and it has now been decided to replace the existing provisions contained in para of the said OM dated 23.09.08, with the following:


"C. Transportation of Personal Effects
Grade Pay
(1)
By Train/Steamer
(2)
Rate per Km for transport by
road (Rs.Per Km.)
(3)
X & Y class
cities*
Z class
cities*
Officers drawing Grade
Pay of Rs. 7600 and
above and those in Pay
Scale HAG+and above
6000 Kgs. By Goods
Train / 4 wheeler
wagon / 1 double
container
30.00
(Rs.0.005 per
kg. per km)
18.00
(Rs.0.003 per
kg. per km
Officers drawing Grade
Pay of Rs. 4200, Rs.
4600, Rs.4800, Rs.5400
and Rs.6600
6000 Kgs. By Goods
Train / 4 wheeler
wagon / 1 single
container
30.00
(Rs.0.005 per
kg. per km)
18.00
(Rs.0.003 per
kg. per km
Officers drawing Grade
Pay of Rs.2800
3000 Kgs. 15.00
(Rs.0.005 per
kg. per km)
9.00
(Rs.0.003 per
kg. per km
Officers drawing Grade
Pay of below Rs.2800
1500 Kgs. 7.50
(Rs.0.005 per
kg. per km)
4.60
(Rs.0.0031
per kg. per km


The rates for transporting the entitled weight by Steamer will be equal to the prevailing rates prescribed by such transport in ships operated by Shipping Corporation of India."

* As per classification of cities for the purpose of admissibility of House Rent Allowance.

2. Attention is also invited to para 4.B of the OM dt. 23.09.08, which regulates the payment of Composite Transfer Grant. In this connection, it is reiterated that the

components and incidentals which were merged/subsumed with the Composite Transfer Grant, as per para 4.B of this Ministry's OM No.19003/2/97-E.IV dt. 17.04.98, remain unchanged.

3. The revised provisions as under para 1 above, shall be applicable w.e.f. 01.09.2008, i.e. the date from which revised T.A. rules are applicable.


(Y.P.Sehgal)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India


Travelling Allowance Rules - 6th CPC
Travelling Allowance Rules - 6th CPC
Admissibility for reimbursement for travel within the city

12 comments:

naval kishore said...

I have transferred on sept,09 to y class city & already claimed the transportation of personnel effects as per old rates. now rates have been revised w.e.f.1.09.08 by order dated 8.06.10 wether I will got the difference . kindly clarify.

avicat said...

Ths ruling borders on the absurd. Imagine a person moving from Ambala to Alleypey in Kerela. Since he moves from one Z station to another his entitlement will be substantially lower than somebody who moves from Ambala to Mumbai. How does one explain that

The Cook said...

You can file a supplementary claim, attaching a copy of this order. You can get the balance amount credited.

amit said...

@avicat the uling is as per the starting stn with no relation as to the destination so there won't be any diff whether you go to mumbai or allepey, all that matters is from where u start

rahul said...

in last two years i have moved from roorkee to wellington & further from wellington to delhi, can i prefer any supplementary claim.

Anonymous said...

From where can i get the latest RMA rates for Ranchi. I require to prepare my claim for transportation of car from Ranchi to Delhi. Can anyone help.

VIREN said...

I AM TRANFER FROM LUDHIANA (Y CLASS CITY)TO DELHI (X CLASS CITY)AND CLAIM MY PERSONAL AT THE NEW ORDER I.E.
RS. 30.00
(Rs.0.005 per
kg. per km)
BUT MY OFFICE IS SAID THAT YOUR PERSONAL EFFECT CLAIM IS SETTLED AT THE RATE TO RS. 18 (RS.0.003 PER KG. PER KM..
IS MY OFFICE VIEW IS RIGHT.
PLEASE CLARIFY IT

nikhil said...

Recently I submit my claim at the rate of above OM from Kolkata to Mumbai.But Our PAO refund the bill as comments: THE CLAIM IS RESTRICTED BY RAILWAY FARE AS THE BOTH CITIES ARE CONNECTED BY RAIL.
Now what can I do? Any one suggest me.
Nikhil.

thulasi said...

As per GOI order No.(1) under SR 116, there were already higher rates of transportation charges @ 30/- , 15/- etc for A-1/A/B-1 cities with clear cut specification that the higher rate is admissible only for carriage of PE from one place to another within the limit of such A-1/A/B-1 cities. Now, when GOI issued order on 23.09.08, this higher rate was not prescribed there,and therefore vide order dated 8.6.10, by indicating that "the issue of OM dated 23.09.08 has led to lowering of per km rates of tpt. of PE by road on transfer in the case of A-1/A/B-1 cities " , has added higher rates for higher cities i.e. X & Y cities. So what should be the correct procedure ? Is it not the correct procedure in the case of a transfer from X/Y city to another X/Y city, to allow higher rates only for that city limits and then lower rates for the remaining/ intervening distances ? Otherwise, how can one define correct rates for a transfer from X/Y city to Z city and vice versa ?The GOI order under SR 116 may be referred and compared with the latest OM.

dinesh said...

Need a clarification--
An employee transferred from Z-class city to X/Y class is entitled for Rs.30/Km or Rs.18/Km ??

Anonymous said...

Please provide me format of advance claim of composite transfer grant with luggage claim

sanjay said...

sir i am in kvs and posted from manipur to bangalore. in 2012 and got ta claim at-rs 18 per km. when i asked for sup claim, my clerk says i am not entitled because i am posted from a c class city (churachandpur, manipur). is he right?

LIST OF CGHS HOSPITALS
1. ALLAHABAD 2. AHEMDABAD 3. Bangalore 4. Bhubhaneshwar 5. Bhopal
6. Chandigarh 7. CHENNAI 8. Delhi 9. Dehradun 10. Guwahati
11. Hyderabad 12. Jaipur 13. Jabalpur 14. Kanpur 15. Kolkata
16. Lucknow 17. Meerut 18. Mumbai 19. Nagpur 20. Patna
21. Pune 22. Ranchi 23. Shillong 24. Trivandrum 25. Jammu.
7th CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION NEWS
TITLEDATEARTICLESORDERS
7TH CPC REPORT AND THE NEED FOR TIMELINESS16.04.20147thCPC Blog
DID YOU KNOW HOW THE 6TH CPC MULTIPLICATION FACTOR OF 1.86 WAS DERIVED..?15.04.201490Paisa
EXPECTED PAY STRUCTURE OF 7TH CPC10.04.201490Paisa
Date of submission of 7th CPC Report05.04.2014-Rajya Sabha
Comments and Suggestions on 7th CPC04.04.201490Paisa
A webpage has been created by the Ministry of Finance for 7th Central Pay Commission24.03.2014-Finmin
Federations veiws on the ToR of 7th CPC05.03.2014AIRF/BPMS/IRTSA
Cabinet approved 7th Central Pay Commission Terms of Reference28.02.201490Paisa
Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission04.02.201490Paisa
NO COMPROMISE ON TERMS OF REFERENCE07.12.2013NFPE
Possible ToR meeting with Staff Side JCM-Dopt19.11.2013Dopt
7th CPC Date for implementation11.10.20137thcpcnews
Press Statement of Confederation of 7th CPC25.09.2013Confederation
Consent given by PM for 7th CPC25.09.201390Paisa
RETIREMENT AGE 62
HEADLINESDATEOUR BLOGOTHER BLOGSOTHER MEDIAS
Retirement age of 65: The Politicization of Employees’ Demands11.04.201490Paisa--
Retirement age to 62-What is the background behind this news?01.03.201490Paisa--
50% DA Merger and Retirement age almost disappeared from CG Employees Diary...!07.03.2014-GServants-
High hopes fading due to announcement of election dates...05.03.2014-Karnmk-
Proposals of Retirement age 62 and 50% DA Merger..?01.03.2014-GServants-
Retirement Age 62 - Cabinet expected to clear on Friday (28.202014)26.02.201490Paisa--
Retirement Age 62 – Cabinet is likely to clear some of these demands..!25.02.2014-PCUpdate
Proposal for raising Retirement Age to 62 waits for Cabinet Nod17.02.2014-GServants-
Parliamentary panel urged to raise the retirement age to 65 years08.02.2014--TOI
Retirement Age 62 : Govt not considering to raise retirement age to 6218.08.2013-PTI
Retirement age 62 – No hike in Retirement age of Central Government employees…15.08.2013-CGEN.in-
Retirement Age 62 - Prime Minister likely to declare on his Independence Day speech14.08.2013-CGEN.in-
Retirement Age of High Court Judges23.08.201390Paisa--
Retirement Age 62 – Cabinet decision to increase retirement age deferred03.08.2013--B.Standard
No plan to increase retirement age of employees16.06.2013--PTI
Pros and cons of raising the retirement age of Central Government Employees09.06.2013-EOrders-
No decision on central staff retirement age on cabinet meeting05.06.2013-PCUpdate-
Retirement age to be extended by 2 years to 6204.06.2013--FExpress
Increase retirement age of government employees to 6230.05.2013--ET
Union government wants retirement age 6229.05.2013--Rediff
No proposal to enhance the retirement age from 60 to 62 years08.03.201390Paisa--
Call to increase retirement age of bank employees to 6504.02.2013--Hindu
Retirement age of Central Government Employees20.01.201390Paisa--
Retirement age of faculty doctors from 65 to 70 years…03.12.201290Paisa-
Enhancement of superannuation retirement age of KV teachers31.08.201290Paisa-
Retirement age of Teachers and Lecturers26.08.201290Paisa--
Cabinet today approved the proposal to enhancement of age of superannuation of teachers to 6521.07.2012--PIB
Retirement age across the world - ILC Report10.07.2011--Global
Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed05.09.2010--PTI
PIL on retirement age of civil servants 25.09.2010--PTI

Disclaimer

90 Paisa News : As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post.

All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog.


Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only.

90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Any suggestions write to us
90paisa2008@gmail.com


Related Posts with Thumbnails