Wednesday, December 07, 2011

4th Meeting of National Anomaly Committee

Flash News : Meeting of National Anomaly Committee.

The next meeting of National Anomaly Committee will be held on 5th January, 2012.

The last, third meeting of National Anomaly Committee held on 15th February 2011 in Room No.119, North Block, New Delhi under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Personnel). The list of participants who attended the third meeting of the National Anomaly Committee as follows...

1. Shri.U.M.Purohit, Secretary (Staff Side)
2. Shri.Rakhal Das Gupta, Member
3. Shri.R.P.Bhatnagar, Member
4. Shri.Guman Singh, Member
5. Shri.C.Srikumar, Member
6. Shri.S.K.Vyas, Member
7. Shri.R.Srinivasan, Member
8. Shri.K.K.N.Kutty, Member
9. Shri.S.G.Mishra, Member
10. Shri.K.S.Murthy, Member

An important Office Memorandum[F.No.11/2/2008-JCA Vol.(II) dated 2.12.2011] has been issued by the Department of Personnel and Training regarding the meeting of the National Anomaly Committee.

The 4th meeting of the National Anomaly Committee to discuss the anomalies arising out the implementation of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission is scheduled to be held on Thursday, the 5th January, 2012 at 3.00 P.M. in Room No.119, North Block, New Delhi, Secretary, Department of Personnel & Training will chair the meeting. The Agenda points for the meeting will be published shortly.

The list of Staff Side of the National Anomaly Committee as follows...

1. Shri.U.M.Purohit, President, AIRF, 42/13, Railway Quarters, Malad (East), Mumbai - 400 071.

2. Shri.S.G.Mishra, General Secretary, AIRF, Gauri Niwas, Mavaiya, Lucknow.

3. Shri.Shiv Gopal Mishra, General Secretary, AIRF, 4, State Entry Road, New Delhi - 110055.

4. Shri.Rakhal Das Gupta, Working President, AIRF, P.O.Bongaigaon, Distt.Bongaigaon, Assam.

5. Shri.Ch.Sankara Rao, Asst.General Secretary AIRF, Railway Quarter No.566/3, Rail Nilayam Colony, Secunderabad 500071 (AP)

6. Shri.Guman Singh, President, NFIR, B-9, Nand Puri Hawa Sarak, Baisgodam, Jaipur-302019.

7. Shri.M.Raghavaiah, General Secretary, NFIR, Railway Quarter No.428/1, Chilkdlguda, Secunderabad - 500025 (AP)

8. Shri.R.P.Bharnagar, Working President, NFIR, Railway Quarter No.F/3, Near Loco Workshop, Parel, Mumabi-400012

9. Shri.K.S.Murthy, Vice President, NFIR, Block No.112/6, Unit 2, Garden Reach, Kolkata-43

10. Shri.S.K.Vyas, 13-C, Ferozeshaha Road, New Delhi-110001

Source: www.cgstaffnews.com

Related posts…

National Anomaly Committee Meeting Conclusions and Discussions
Feedback on the 3rd meeting of the National Anomaly Committee – AIRF
National Anomaly Committee meeting discussion points...

128 comments:

Girija Shankar Saxena said...

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,
Please discuss the matter of AI to those employees whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006. If seriously calculated, the affected individuals are very much sufferer during service and even on retirement. Thanks.
Girija Shankar Saxena
O/Supdt, GE (U) E/S Delhi Cantt

Anonymous said...

Dear JCM Members, it is a request to raise the case of LDC & UDCs of Central Govt. subordinate offices of All over India. Due to implementation of 6CPC, the worst affected cadre is LDC & UDC, adding salt to the injury MACP worsened further. So fight for upliftment of educated LDC & UDC cadres and promotional hierarchy under MACP. From :Mr.N.Ramadas, UDC, CBS, AIR, Cuttack.

Ramesh Keshari said...

Respected Chairman Sir and Hon'ble Member,
Kindly discuss the matter regarding Entry Pay should be given to Promotive Assistant Audit Officer as compared to Direct recruited Assistant Audit Officer.
Regards.
R. K. Keshari
Dehradun.

Meenakshi said...

Please discuss the MACP of Library staff As prior to 6th CPC the scale under ACP were as same as promotional hierarchy. the staff was getting Rs.6500-10500 as Ist ACP and Rs.10000/- scale as second ACP. But now the person who gets his first ACP as Rs.6500/- that is the grade pay of Rs.4600/- will get his 2nd ACP as Rs.4800/- and third ACP as Rs.5400 GP and will never reach the scale of Rs.10000/- (pre revised) and the person will get retire at the GP of Rs.5400/- and whereas the person who got his 2nd ACP of Rs.10000/- will get his 3rd ACP in the GP of Rs.12000/- and gap will go on. Please see to it that MACP will be in promotional hierarchy.

Meenakshi
Delhi

Meenakshi said...

Kindly discuss the matter regarding MACP of Library staff in promotional hierarchy as the difference will be lot in grade pay in the sfaff as prior to 6th pay commission the ACP was Rs.6500-10500/- and further Rs.10000/- one. whereas in new pay commission it will be Ist ACP: G.Rs.4600/-, 2nd ACP Rs.4800/- 3rd ACP Rs.5400 GP. Person will not be able to get Rs.10000/- As GP whereas the person who has already got 2nd ACP in the Scale of Rs.10000/- (Pre revised) and 3rd ACP Rs.12000/- and difference between the staff will go on.

Durga Prasad Sssshaw said...

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,
Please discuss the matter of AI to those employees whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006. If seriously calculated, the affected individuals are very much sufferer during service and even on retirement. Thanks.
Durga Prasad Shaw, Section Officer(Retired), Ministry Finance, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.

Anonymous said...

In the MACP scheme 10,20,30 or which ever is earlier should be taken into consideration from the date of joining only at each stage and not from the date of issue of order which takes away all the benefits which an employee and the purpose for which the scheme was introduced has been totally defeated. e.g.Joining year 1987, 1st macp 1991 2nd should be 2001 and 3rd 2011, but the interpretation is 10 years from 1.9.2008 i.e. 2018 or earlier i.e.1987+30+2017. This scheme seems to a gimmick.

chennai

Anonymous said...

Sir, Please take the matter for allotment Type -D accommodation for Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- as already done by the Ministry of Railway

With regards,

vasudev said...

Respected chairman and members.
consequent to the merging of 5000, 5500 and 6500 scales of V pay commission, pays are fixed with a grade pay of 4200. subsequently it was ordered that pay scale of 6500 is to be fixed with a separate grade pay of 4600. likewise is it possible that 5000 and 5500 can be given separate grade pay. Also to mention that those who join in 4200 grade pay will get under ACP the grade pay of 4600 and 4800 after the completion of 10 and 20 years which is meager. cant this be changed?(atleast from 4600 to 5400)

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman Sir and Members,
Kindly discuss the matter of those employees whose Date of Next Increment was between Feb to Jun 2006 and take appropriate favourable orders as an one time measure. This is postponement of increment and it should not be happened. And the affected individuals are very much suffering during service and even on retirement. So Kindly take favourable necessary action and discuss and obtain necessary favourable decision and orders. Thankyou.

Anonymous said...

Kindly discuss the matter of those employees whose Date of Next Increment was between Feb to Jun 2006 .

Anonymous said...

Sir,

I request you to please discuss the matter in the next JCM concerning the DNI between Feb to June 2006. Thousands of employees/pensioners will benefit if the JCM is decided to take a favourable action.

Pl also discuss various problems of Central University employees, including unfavourable service conditions and pay parity with Central Secretariat/Ministries staff in various posts. The University staff are also selected after going through the written, trade test & interview. But they have denied pay parity with the Central Secrtariat staff, particularly SOs & Senior PAs. This may please be brought to the notice of the appropriate authorities. Even pay scales/G.P. are different in certain same categories in Central Universities

Thanks,

V.Kumar
Working in a Central University in Delhi.

Anonymous said...

Dear Members,

The matter pertaining to DNI between Feb to June 2006 may please be discussed so that several thousands of pensioners will be benefited. Is it not the right of the employees to draw theincrement from Feb to June 2006?
Kindly consider the case sympathetically.

Rgrds

Anonymous

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman and Members.
Kindly consider the plight of certain categories of employees in Dept. of Inf. Technology. Earlier there was cadre Rs.4500-7000 and the promotional cadre was Rs.5500-9000 and later Rs.6500-10500. However, just before the implementation of the RP, the cadre Rs.4500-7000 was merged with Rs.5500-9000. Due to this, those employees served in the cadre Rs.4500-7000 and got promoted to Rs.5500-9000 were not given any extra weightage. Once the Pay Scales were implemented, these two scales were put in to one Grade Pay RS.4200/- (in PB-2). Those who have worked more than 12 years were in the same Grade Pay of a new entrant/or those who are getting promoted from the pre-revised scale of Rs.4000-6000. This is a big anomaly and no one care about these categories of employees, since they are unorganised.

jayaraj A C,Kasaragod said...

sir,
kindly take-up the issue of the officials like us very seriously whose DNI falling between Feb and June-2006.If it is not possible to make a decision through anomaly committee meeting, allow us to approach Hon.court against this discrimination.

Adesh Gupta said...

Its a greate news. Please discuss the the Feb-Jun increament matter as these employess are most effected.

Regards

Adesh Gupta

babu said...

At the outset, I would like to congratulate you for fighting the cause of helpless Govt., employees who have no voice to raise or strength to fight for their right in getting genuine benefits.

I am working in Central Board for Workers Education (CBWE), Nagpur as AD (OL). My Grade Pay is Rs. 4600/-. CBWE is an Autonomous Organisation under Ministry of Labour and Employment of Govt., of India.

Though I have made several representations to the Ministry through my organization, the Ministry has not granted the revised pay scale saying that the Ministry of Finance has not extended the pay scales to the Official Language Staff working in Autonomous Organisations.

Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) and Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) are also Autonomous Organisations under Ministry of Labour and Employment of Govt., of India. They have implemented the 6CPC recommended pay scales to their Official Language Staff on par with CSOLS Pay scales.

Why the discrimination among different Autonomous Organisations of the same Ministry?

Though our organization is spread across the length and breadth of the entire country having 58 offices, only 4 posts are there in the Hindi Section and that too at Head Office. Hence we are unable to raise our voice in absence of any union or strength to do so.

I humbly request your good self to look into our matter sympathetically and help us to be placed on par with our official language fraternity so as to work with dignity and honour.

sonu ajeet said...

plese merger the grade pay of LDC 2800 because group d grade pay 1800 and LDC grade pay 1900 this is justify

sureshkumar said...

dear chairman/members In ordnance factories A person appointed as a labour he gets Rs.4200/- as gradepay after completion of 30 years in macp.But a workman gets only Rs.2800/-as gradepay after 30 years. Please consider the matter and consider HSII to HSI as a upgradrtion . THANK YOU K.Suresh/ OFT

Anonymous said...

Sir. In ordnancefactories labour can get Rs.4200/ in 3 macp but a worker get Rs.2800/ in 3macp. Please consider HSII to HS I as upgradation it is not a promotion. THANKYOU K.SURESHKUMAR. OFT

raju said...

Respected Sirs,
The upcoming meeting of anomoloy committee is the only hope for the group c employees i.e. LDC, UDC whom they are worstly effected cadre of union government after implementation of 6th cpc,presently grade pay of 1900 and 2400 for LDC AND UDC respectively given is very much discriminatary compare to other post of group D and B. My personal opinion in this regard is that LDC post should given grade pay of 2400 and UDC is for 4200 just as other department where restructureing has been already done ie. income tax, epfo etc,there is no uniformatiy in central government departments nowdays, because government has discrimanatry attitude against non revenue departments of GOI. Every govenemnt employee and officer working in any deparment only working for soloely for the GOI, then no reason for discrimanation. I HUMBLY REQUEST TO YOU ALL PLEASE TAKE THIS MATTER ON PRIORITY.

Anonymous said...

Dear Chairman,

Kindly take up the issue with the committee regarding fixation of Grade Pay of Group B Gazetted Officer alike Section Officer and Gp B Offr of other ministry.e.g. Ministry of Finance grant their Gp B Officer the Grade Pay of 4800 and after 4 years 5400 but the Gp B Officers in Ministry of Labour like Labour Enforcement Officer and Welfare Administrator still continue with Grade pay of 4600 without any NFU.
Thanks and please raise the issue in next meeting.

Abhimanyu Lenka

manhar said...

please club all the three pre-revised payscales of 5000-150-8000, 5500-200-9000 & 6500-250-10000 in to 6500-250-10000 as recommended by the 6th CPC first,and then after to fix the new pay scale (PB-2,GP-4600) as per 6th CPC w.e.f.01.01.2006 to all the concerned central govt. employees in every departments of central government.

Hira said...

DEAR SIR
I am junior engineer since my joining date 20-10-1984 in S&JJ deptt. Now Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) Govt. NCT ,Delhi. IN 6TH CPC THEIR ARE SO MANY ANOMALIES WHICH SHOLD BE REMOVED. GP SHOULD BE PROPOTIONATELY increased eg in the pay scale of 5000-8000 all (whose BP 5000&those Bp7850)get the same GP.INCREMENT SHOULD BE 5%.IN MACP IT IS worse than OF PREVIOUS ACP. IN MACP JE WILL GET GP FROM 4200 TO 4600 TO 4800 TO 5400 WHILE OTHER (JOIN BEFORE 31-8-1984) WILL GET 4200 TO 4600 TO 6600 TO 7600.HOWEVER THEY PERFORM THE SAME DUTIES WHICH IS AGAINST THE GOVT OWN POLICY.SAME WORK&POST BUT SALARY DIFFERENCE ABOUT Rs 6000/-WHICH WILL BE UP TO 24000/-AND TOTAL LOSS OF ABOUT Rs 39 LAKHS. In 2 nd ACP the scale jumps from 8700 in 6500-10500 to 10000 in 10000-15200 gain of Rs1300+DP+allowances while in 2 nd MACP GP jumps 200(4600 to 4800) only. Instead of increases by 1.86+GP it losses. Is it justified? ENGINEER SHOULD GET 25%AS TECHNICAL ALLOWANCE. THE PREREVISED PAY SCALE OF7450 SHOULD GET POINT TO POINT INCREMENTS. THE GP OF 7450 SHOULD BE IN THE SAME RATIO OF 5000 SCALE IE APPROXIMATE BE 6000/ SIR YOU ARE REQUESTED TO LOOK THE MATTER SERIOUSLY TO PREVENT JEALOUS & HATRED AMONGST EMPLOYEES .AND ALSO I HAD NOT GOT THE PROMOTION SINCE JOINING (20-10-84)THOUGH I AM ELIGIBLE AND FIT FOR PROMOTION SINCE 13-09-88.It is suggested that in MACP Of 10-20-30 should be amended to 12-24-30 with same PB&GP as promotional for 12-24 and for 3rd macp after 30 may be next GP of hierarchy for all, does not violate the rule same post same work same salary as against 10-20-30. It is prayed/appealed to look into genuine anomaly and do the justice. It is humble requested to look into anomalies in CPC&MACP peronnaly.
Thanks
FROM
HIRA NAND
9717999128
DETAILED
Item Pay as on 2nd MACP after 1-09-08 DA-16%
Pay as on 2nd MACP on 1-01-11 DA 51%

Pay as on pre 2nd macp JE Those join post 01-09-84 JE Those join pre 01-09-84 JE Those join post 01-09-84) JE Those join pre 01-09-84
Pay Band 17310 17970
18600 19370
20140
Grade Pay 4600 4800
6600 4800
6600
Basic Pay 21910 22770
25200 24170
26740
H R A(30%) 6573 6831
7560 7251
8022
DA 3506 3643
4032 12327
13637
TA 1856 1856
3712 2416
4832
Total 33845 35100
40504 46164
53231
Difference 1255
6659
7067
Difference
5404








Item Pay as on 2nd ACP


Pay as on pre 2nd ACP JE Those join post 01-09-84 JE Those join pre 01-09-84
BP 8700 10000
10000

DP 4350 5000
5000

CCA 300 300
300

H R A(30%) 3915 4500
4500

DA 6134 7050
7050

TA 400 800 800
Total 23799 27650
27650

Difference 3851
3851

Difference
00

Girija Shankar Saxena said...

Respected Chairman Sir and Members as well, I am writing this mail just to remind to discuss the matter of AI for those employees whose DNI was between Feb and Jun 2006. As these employees are worst sufferer because of getting there AnnualIncrement in that period after 17,18 months and so on (which was due after 12 months) for no fault of them except of the faulty policy of VIth Pay Commission. In the Hindi Version of Gadget of India, Govt. had proposed for two dates for AI i.e. Jan and July which was NOT accepted by the Pay Comm. creating unnecessary problem for we people Either the One Time Grant of AI procedure should be adopted or Two Dates i.e Jan and July should be considered to avoid any feeling of harassment.
Girija Shankar Saxena,
O/Supdt
GE (U) Elect Supply Delhi Cantt

Anonymous said...

please discuss about the pay fixation of welfare inspestors in railways who have been not justified properly

Anonymous said...

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,
1. Kindly consider the grievances of employees like me about whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006 and postponed to Jul 2006 in VIth CPC. If seriously calculated, the affected individuals are very much sufferer during service and even on retirement. Other hand VIth CPC given undue benefit to employees whose DNI between Aug 2006 to Dec 2006 by preponding their AI wef 01 Jyl 2006.

2. LDC,UDC & ASST of BRO (GREF) are worstly effected cadre after implementation of 6th cpc,presently grade pay of 1900, 2400 & 4200 for LDC,UDC ASST respectively given is very much discriminatary compare to other post of group D and B of BRO as well as other Deptt/CPMF. My personal opinion in this regard is that LDC post should given grade pay of 2400 UDC is for 2800/4200 and ASST is for 4600 just as other department where restructureing has already been done ie. income tax, epfo etc,there is no uniformatiy in central government departments nowdays, because government has discrimanatry attitude against non revenue departments of GOI like BRO. Every govenemnt employee and officer working in any Central deparment only for soloely for the GOI, then no reason for discrimanation. I HUMBLY REQUEST TO YOU ALL PLEASE SETTLE THESE MATTERS ON PRIORITY.

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

UDC S Marichamy (BRO/GREF)..

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,
1. Kindly consider the grievances of employees like me about whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006 and postponed to Jul 2006 in VIth CPC. If seriously calculated, the affected individuals are very much sufferer during service and even on retirement. Other hand VIth CPC given undue benefit to employees whose DNI between Aug 2006 to Dec 2006 by preponding their AI wef 01 Jyl 2006.

2. LDC,UDC & ASST of BRO (GREF) are worstly effected cadre after implementation of 6th cpc,presently grade pay of 1900, 2400 & 4200 for LDC,UDC ASST respectively given is very much discriminatary compare to other post of group D and B of BRO as well as other Deptt/CPMF. My personal opinion in this regard is that LDC post should given grade pay of 2400 UDC is for 2800/4200 and ASST is for 4600 just as other department where restructureing has already been done ie. income tax, epfo etc,there is no uniformatiy in central government departments nowdays, because government has discrimanatry attitude against non revenue departments of GOI like BRO. Every govenemnt employee and officer working in any Central deparment only for soloely for the GOI, then no reason for discrimanation. I HUMBLY REQUEST TO YOU ALL PLEASE SETTLE THESE MATTERS ON PRIORITY.

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

LDC Samsher Kumar (BRO/GREF)..

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,
1. Kindly consider the grievances of employees like me about whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006 and postponed to Jul 2006 in VIth CPC. If seriously calculated, the affected individuals are very much sufferer during service and even on retirement. Other hand VIth CPC given undue benefit to employees whose DNI between Aug 2006 to Dec 2006 by preponding their AI wef 01 Jyl 2006.

2. LDC,UDC & ASST of BRO (GREF) are worstly effected cadre after implementation of 6th cpc,presently grade pay of 1900, 2400 & 4200 for LDC,UDC ASST respectively given is very much discriminatary compare to other post of group D and B of BRO as well as other Deptt/CPMF. My personal opinion in this regard is that LDC post should given grade pay of 2400 UDC is for 2800/4200 and ASST is for 4600 just as other department where restructureing has already been done ie. income tax, epfo etc,there is no uniformatiy in central government departments nowdays, because government has discrimanatry attitude against non revenue departments of GOI like BRO. Every govenemnt employee and officer working in any Central deparment only for soloely for the GOI, then no reason for discrimanation. I HUMBLY REQUEST TO YOU ALL PLEASE SETTLE THESE MATTERS ON PRIORITY.

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman and Honorable members,
please discuss matter regarding MACP of library staff, which should be in promotional hierarchy of post as per DOPT vide letter number 35034/1/97-Esst(D)(Vol. IV)dated 10.02.2000 under point of doubt 19. the categorization of libraries pay scale by ministry of finance office memorandum number 19(1)/IC/86/, dated 24.07.1990 i.e. entry grade pay Rs.4200.
1st up-gradation GP Rs.4600, 2nd up-gradation GP Rs.6600, 3rd up- gradation GP Rs.8700. in our dept. library employees fulfill promotional and direct RR norms.
regarding absorption of contingent period of service followed by regularization without break should be counted for the purpose of MACP. the similar action has already been done by Indian railways, vide letter no. PC-V/2004/ACP/1, dt. 31.03.2004 and PC-V/2009/ACP/2, dt 25.02.2010.
further discuss the matter of employees whose DNI was between February to June 2006. retirement should be granted once a year in December, as increment is due in July.
please approve and finalize our cases from DOPT in the 4th national anomaly committee.
with regard.

Shiva said...

RESPECTED CHAIRMAN AND ALL MEMBERS,

PLEASE PLEASE LOOK INTO THE MATTER OF LDC/UDCs GRADE PAY, THE MOST AFFECTED CADRE IN THE 6TH CPC, THIS IS THE ONLY PLATFORM WE ARE HOPING

Anonymous said...

The most burning issue is the case of the employees whose DNI falls between FEB and JUNE.They suffer not because of their fault.

Anonymous said...

respected sir i very humbly requested to you that please discuss the issue of pay scales of official language staff with official side as jr. hindi tranaslator/jr.translator was given old pay scale of 6500/- with effect from 01.01.06. but not given the gradepay 4600. thanks.

Anonymous said...

Kindly discuss the anomaly after merging three scale i.e 5000, 5500 and 6500. Please discuss the uniform grade pay of rs 4600 for the above three scales w.e.f. 1.1.2006.

Anonymous said...

R/JCM Members,
It is requested to rake up the issue of granting MACP to Inspectors -RPF fixed in scale PB-II, 9300-34800+4600 GP asper 6th CPC report.The Inspectors RPF has been granted next MACP in GP of 4800 as per GP heirarchy whereas the grade pay 4800 is not existing in the promotional heirarchy of RPF deptt.All Insp. are promoted as ASC in group-A,PB-III, 15600-39100+5400.The RPF cadre has also been placed in GP-4800 which is not existing in the promotional structure of RPF deptt.The GP heirarchy can not be treated as carrier progression of RPF Insp. under MACP. In the earlier meeting Official side wanted the particulars of those cadres which are going to face the problems due to GP heirarchy, hence Staff Side is requested to high light the issue of RPF staff working under Ministry of Rlys in the coming meeting of NAC dated 05.01.2012.Pl.

With regards

S.P.Singh
Insp.RPF/ Ambala

E-Mail add-spsr@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

staff in grade 7450-11500 in V PC the most neglected category. Nither grouB status is given nor aseparate GP is given. Instead the 6500-10500 of Vth PC is merged and seniors are left ignored. Even after 13 years in 7450-11500 no MACP or promised group B status still awaited.

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman and memebers of the Anomaly committee........
Traffic Running Staff are badly affected after the vi pay commission was out. The cadre has only two Grade Pay ... i.e Rs. 2800/- and Rs. 4200/- which is very negligible for the cadre...
please seee that at least Rs 4600/-grade pay is being sanctioned for the Traffic Running Staff...

S. K. Bhowmik, Pass Guard, Santragachi, S. E. Railway.

Anonymous said...

MACP should be re-modified in such a way 12-24-30 yrs upagradations. The first two upgradation should be promotional post pay and the last should be next higher grade pay.

Anonymous said...

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,
1. Kindly consider the grievances of employees like me about whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006 and postponed to Jul 2006 in VIth CPC. If seriously calculated, the affected individuals are very much sufferer during service and even on retirement. Other hand VIth CPC given undue benefit to employees whose DNI between Aug 2006 to Dec 2006 by preponding their AI wef 01 Julyl 2006.

Anonymous said...

I request the honourable NAC members to take up on to priority the long pending case of unfortunate Govt employees whose DNI falling between Feb 2006-Jun 2006 and are denied the increment on 1st July 2006.
I also suggest the NAC to sympathetically consider their case and approve giving them one increment on 1st July 2006 as a one time good gesture.
This will not create any further anomalies ,as feared in the case of giving one increment in the pre-revised scale.
Hoping the NAC will do the favour and justice and with THANKS.

Prakash said...

Grade Pay of LDC and UDC should be increased as 2400 and 2800 because :

1. Work/assignment:

Work/assignment like proper and prompt documentation, record keeping, typing work and presently good computer operating etc. done by the LDC/UDC which is required high skill and mental ability with knowledge.

2. Promotion opportunity :

As per recruitment rules LDC/UDC is promoted against the post in the hierarchy after completion of required regular service but most of the time LDC/UDC is not getting the promotion upto 10 years after completion of required regular service in the post due to non availability of higher post in the hierarchy.

For example : as per rule a LDC is required at least 5 years regular service in the grade for promotion to the post of UDC but he is not getting promotion due to non availability of the post after completion of 15/16 years of regular service, after that he is promoted to the post of UDC in this situation he is required 10 years regular service in the post of UDC for promotion to next higher post in the hierarchy.

The MACP is not helpful in the situation because the MACP seems like a band-aid on cancer tumor not a surgery.

Keeping in view of above, it clears that the present grade pay is keeping for LDC/UDC is not justified. Hence, the grade pay of LDC/UDC should be increased i.e. 2400 for LDC and 2800 for UDC w.e.f. 01.01.2006.

COL LAMBA said...

RESPECTED CHAIRMAN,MEMBERS & STAFF
KINDLY DISCUSS MERGER OF 50%DA AS DP FOR SERVING/PENSIONERS/WIDOWS
No proposal to merger of dearness allowance with Basic Pay
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA - MINISTRY OF FINANCE - LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 859 / ANSWERED ON 25.02.2011
DA OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
859. Smt. P. JAYA PRADA NAHATA
NEERAJ SHEKHAR
YASHVIR SINGH
Will the Minister of FINANCE be pleased to state:-
(a) Whether Government has plans to increase dearness allowance effective from January, 2011 for Central Government employees with a rate that commensurate with the inflationary trends and plights of working class in the past few months;
(b) If so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefore;
(c) Whether Government has any proposals to declare DA as Dearness Pay when it will cross 50 per cent, as it was done during the 5th Pay Commission;
(d) If so, the details thereof; and
(e) If not the reasons therefore?
ANSWER
MINISTER OF THE STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI NAMO NARIAN MEENA)
(a)&fb): Increase in Dearness Allowance payable to Central Government employees with effect from January, 2011 will be worked out on basis of accepted formula which is based on the recommendation of 6th Central Pay Commission.
(Ch (d) & (e): No proposal to declare DA as dearness pay, after DA crosses 50% is under consideration of the Government. The Sixth Pay Commission did not recommend merger of dearness allowance with Basic Pay at any stage. Government accepted this recommendation vide Government of India Resolution dated 29.8.2008.
6th PAY COMMISSION OMMISSION OF NOT MERGING DA AT 50% FOR PENSIONE/WIDOW IS A GREAT INJUSTICE

REPRESENTATION MADEBY-COL LAMBA
1.IN 5th CPC DA WAS MERGED BASIC PAY/PENSION AS DP
ON ATTAINING 50% DA
2.IN 6th CPC VARIOUS ALLOWANCES FOR SERVING HAS BEEN HIKED BY 25% ON ATTAINING DA AT 50% MARK
3.SO IT IS GREAT A INJUSTICE TO PENSIONER & WIDOWS AS DA HAS 50% BUT IS NOT BEING ADDED AS DP AS IN 5th CPC.ANY LOGIC PLEASE FOR THIS VARIATION.PENSIONER& WIDOWS WILL BE LOSER. IT WILL HAVE CUMULATIVE EFFECT ON EVERY DA HIKE ON HALF YEARLY BASIS INTERMS OF PRINCIPAL & INTEREST ON IT TILL THE MASK IS CORRECTED & DP MERGER IS IMPLEMENTED
4. KINDLY RESTORE MERGER AT 50% DA IMMEDIATELY AS DP & INTEREST ON DELAYED PAYMENT BE PAID TO PENSIONER& WIDOWS

madhavi garg said...

madhavi naveen garg: On November 11th, 2011
Why has Department of official Lanuage not implemented the order no.1/1/2008-IC,Government of India,Ministry of Finance,Department of Revenue,New Delhi dated 13th Nov.,2009?Whereas Directorate of REVENUE INTELLIGENCE,7th Floor,D Block,I.P.Bhawan,I.P.Estate,New DELHI,itself and many other departments have granted their jr. hindi translators the grade pay of 4600 on the basis of the above said orders?where the confusion lies?why some Departments are implementing this order and some are not implementing? PLEASE CLARIFY.PAYSCALES SHOULD BE IDENTICAL FOR THE SIMILAR POSTS EVERYWHERE.Please discuss the matter in 4th anomaly Committee Meeting sheduled on 5th jan 2012.




Read more here: http://entrance-exam.net/pay-scale-for-junior-hindi-translator-in-government-jobs/#ixzz1h4iP4KoV

RAJ said...

Dear Prakash where you got REQUIRED AT LEAST 5 YEARS REGULAR SERVICE IN THE GRADE OF LDC FOR PROMOTION TO UDC KINDLY SEND DOP&T'S OM & DT TO ME OR SEE DOP&T OM NO. AB.14017/61/2008-Estt.(RR) DT 24 Mar 2009.


My ID is w.rajanikant@gmail.com

Thanking you.

Prakash said...

Grade Pay of LDC and UDC should be increased as 2400 and 2800 because :

1. Work/assignment:

Work/assignment like proper and prompt documentation, record keeping, typing work and presently good computer operating etc. done by the LDC/UDC which is required high skill and mental ability with knowledge.

2. Promotion opportunity :

As per recruitment rules LDC/UDC is promoted against the post in the hierarchy after completion of required regular service but most of the time LDC/UDC is not getting the promotion upto 10 years after completion of required regular service in the post due to non availability of higher post in the hierarchy.

For example : as per rule a LDC is required at least 5 years regular service in the grade for promotion to the post of UDC but he is not getting promotion due to non availability of the post

jagannadh said...

The prime issues for discussion are:
1) One additional increment for the eligible staff whose old increments falling in between Feb 2006 to June,2006.
2) MACP on promotional hierarchy mode as the very purpose of extending 3 benefits by 6th CPC has been defeated with next higher grade pay.
3) Fixation factor for lower cadre should also be increased at par with PB-4.
4) Considering increase of transport allowance or at least to give 25% extra at par with other allowances as and when DA crosses 50%.
5) Dilution of qualifying service on promotion from one cadre to another as the qualifying service prescribed in lower cadres is very high than the higher grade pays.

Prakash said...

Dear Raj befor issuing the New guideline/order of DOPT, as per old recruitment rules LDC is required at least 5 years regular service in the grade for promotion to the post of UDC and as per new guideline, required at least 8 years inliue of 5 years service.

Anonymous said...

There is a big anomaly in fixation in the pay of sr.scale officer(pay rs.11950 as on 1-1-06) and the pay fixed for matron(11950 as on 1-1-06)i,e for sr.scale officer is rs.22230 but for the same has been done for matron as rs.22980.This may pl be looked into

Anonymous said...

As per DOPT clarification Dt.09/09/2010 the Group-A officers are not eligible for the benefits of of MACP as they have already been allowed parity of 2 Years on non functional basis with IAS officers. But in effect the MACP benefits are denied for those Gr-A officers also who have not been given such pay parity. This is a great injustice to the Departmentally recruited staff.The departmentally recruited staff who enter as Gr-C, have come up to Gr-A by virtue of their long service (more than 35 years) and seniority. These officers are weighed on the same balance of the newly recruited Gr-A officers thru UPSC/IES and the benefits of MACP are denied to these departmental promotees aho are inducted as Group A at the fag end of their service. This is against natural justice and the Anomally comittee scheduled to meet on 05/01/2012 may kindly discuss this issue.

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman and members of the JCM there is one very important issue to be discussed in the scheduled meeting on 05/01/2012. In some of the departments like Central Water Commission (MOWR) recruitments are made to the post of JE`s (Group-C) thru employment exchange. Due to stagnation and so many departmental problems these JEs are not getting timely promotions. Those who come up to Group- B (AE) and then to Group-A (AEE) by seniority and long service ( more than 32 years) are denied the benefits of MACP as the AEEs come under Group-A. The clarification issued by the DOPT on 09/09/2010 is that the benefits of the MACP are not applicable to the Group-A organized as they have been allowed the parity of 2 years on non-functional basis with the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). But it is a fact that many of these Departmentally promoted Group-A officers have neither been given such benefit of parity nor the benefit of MACP. Putting these departmentally promoted Group-A officers with the newly appointed Group A officers (thru IES exam/UPSC) and denying the MACP benefits to the departmentally promoted Group-A officers is a big blow and injustice. Respected Chairman and members of the anomaly committee may kindly discuss this issue lease.

Anonymous said...

Asst Dukharan Ram (BRO/GREF)

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,
1. Kindly resolve the matter about AI falls between Feb to Jun 2006 and which has been erroneously postponed to Jul 2006 by VIth CPC. VIth CPC has done a great discrimination between employees whose DNI falls during Feb to Jun 2006 and Aug 2006 to Dec 2006. It is not understood as the VI CPC why not AI of employees whose DNI falls during Feb to Jun 2006 preponding wef 01 Jul 2006 as done for IA falls during Aug 2006 to Dec 2006. Such type affected employees like me should be given one AI at old rate wef 01 Jan 2006 and then re-fix their pay in VI CPC to meet the natural justice.

2. LDC,UDC & ASST of BRO (GREF) are worstly effected cadre after implementation of 6th cpc,presently grade pay of 1900, 2400 & 4200 for LDC,UDC ASST respectively given is very much discriminatary compare to other post of group D and B of BRO as well as other Deptt/CPMF. My personal opinion in this regard is that LDC post should given grade pay of 2400 UDC is for 2800/4200 and ASST is for 4600 just as other department where restructureing has already been done ie. income tax, epfo etc,there is no uniformatiy in central government departments nowdays, because government has discrimanatry attitude against non revenue departments of GOI like BRO. Every govenemnt employee and officer working in any Central deparment only for soloely for the GOI, then no reason for discrimanation. I HUMBLY REQUEST TO YOU ALL PLEASE SETTLE THESE MATTERS ON PRIORITY.

My ID : drbindu67@gmail.com
Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Respected Sir, We will like to draw your kind attention towards the anomaly of MACP Scheme, which is less advantageous than the ACP Scheme Showing illustration for financial loss of MACP in Library Stream.
Financial ACP MACP Net loss
Upgrada- Promotional Hierar- interm
tion Post GP chical of GP
RS. Rs. next Rs.
higher
GP Rs.

Entry 4200/- 4200/- NIL
PB-2
9300-34800/-

First 4600/- 4600/- NIL
PB-2
9300-34800

Second 6600/- 4800/- 1800/-
PB-3
15600-39100

Third 8700/- 5400/- 3300/-
PB-4
37400-67000

Please consider our case and provide all three financial upgradation in hierarchy of post under MACP for the benefit of the employees.
Thanking you with sincere regards.

visweswar said...

macp in promotional hierarchy is benificail to all those departments where 6th CPC has is a big jolt.

old 6500/- scale has been merged with 7450/- logically 7450 has been down graded to 6500

kindly do justice

Garg said...

Resp.Chairman Sir and Members,

Please discuss the matter of Annual Increment to those employees whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006. they are getting very less as compare to employees of DNI in Jan 2006

Anonymous said...

Respected Members,

You are requested to consider the following:
The Fifth Pay Commission had revised the pay scale of Rs 1640 to Rs 5500 and also not given the mutatis mutandis increments. The increments were foregone for every three years of service.
Thereafter the scale of Inspectors of Income tax was revised to Rs 6500 and consequently that of Income tax Officers to Rs 7500 but with no arrears. This came into effect from April 2004. Thereby further monetary loss was suffered.
The Sixth Pay Commission inflicted a further blow by splitting the ITO scale into 4800 and 5400 grede pay when there existed no such different cadres. While other cadres were bunched this was the one which was split.
The persons who had already put in 4 years of service had to litigate for two years to get the benefit of an anamoly increment to be fixed at Rs 5400
Now on completion of 20 years and no promotions to ACIT being effected the stand that two financial upgradations have been received hits the direct recruit Incpectors hard.
Will at least pay matters carry some sense of justice and logic>

Anonymous said...

Sixth Central Pay Commission is not a bonanza to the lower level employees in any way.it is a classic example for class suppression and discrimination. Group A officers and technical category have been benefited.
Government resolution of acceptance of Pay Commission report speaks the rampant partiality. Many category of Group A officers have been placed in PB-4 who were earlier placed in PB-3 by the pay commission. DA for 100% neutralization of price index is being extended to Group A- officers also which was 70% till 4th Pay Commission(1996).
The difference is extremely high between Pay Band-3 and Pay Band-4. There should have been an intermediate Pay Band at the range of 28000-60000 which has been avoided. At lower level the difference between two pay bands is only nominal of about Rs.100/-
Pay Band- 2 has been created after merging the pre-revised scales of 5000-8000, 5500-9000 and 6500-10500- and Pay Band-3 has been created after merging the pre-revised scales of 8000-13500 and 9000-13500. For arriving the minimum of the Pay Band-2 only the minimum of the lowest pre-revised scales merged (5000) has been taken (5000 x 1.74-later changed to 1.86) where as for Pay Band-3 minimum of the highest pre-revised scales merged (9000 x 1.74) has been taken. Now the pre-revised scale of 6500-10500 has been taken out and merged with pre-revised scale of 7450-11500 and given the grade pay of 4600/-. However, minimum pay as fixed as per the existing fixation formula of employees in position as on 1.1.2006 will be less than that of entry pay specified for direct recruits of grade pay of 4600/-. Pay commission has not derived a separate fixation formula where merging of two or more scales has been taken place. Pay fixation in the revised scale is allowed to be done by pay drawn in the existing scale multiplied by 1.86 in all cases. In many cases the pay specified for corresponding grade pay for direct recruits is much higher than that of the pay fixed as per the fixation formula of existing employees. While framing the Revised Pay Rules 2008, department of expenditure has sidelined the main concept of merging of scales and inserted common fixation formula for all.

Anonymous said...

Please discuss the MACP of stenographer grade D. Prior to 6th CPC the scale under ACP were as same as promotional hierarchy. the staff who were in the pay scale of Rs. 4000-6000/- (now Grade Pay 2400) has been promoted in the 1st ACP in the pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 (now Grade Pay 4200) later which has been upgraded to the scale of Rs. 7450/- (Grade Pay 4600). But under MACP I have given Grade pay of Rs. 2800 i.e. huge difference in promotional hierarchy. It is requested that kindly look into the matter and ACP will be scheme will be implemented at the earlier to avoid the monetary lost to the stenos who have given GP 2800 under MACP or they should be upgraded to the earlier scale of 5500/- (now grade pay 4200).

V.S.MONEY said...

Respected Chairman and members, Please discuss the matter of employees whose DNI from Feb to June 2006 and take a final decision quickly as a large No. of employees both serving and retired employees are eagerly awaiting for the decision.
V.S.MONEY
Branch Manager (Retired)
ESI Corporation.

Ramachandran, NWA, Pune said...

Resp. Chairman & JCM Members,
It is very sad to hear that, 6CPC & MACP worst affected cadre i.e. LDC’s& UDC’s issues are not included in the discussion of 4th anomaly committee.

Anonymous said...

The official those who get increment from Feb to June have lost one year service because THIS OFFICIAL LOOSING ONE INCREMENT other official got one advanced increment. So this parity may be settled in this meeting

Anonymous said...

Please discuss grade pay of RS 5400 to A.A.O.s in Indian Audit and Accounts Department after completion of four years service in RS4800 grade pay.

lekshmy hariharan said...

Kindly consider the grievances of employees like me about whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006 and postponed to Jul 2006 in VIth CPC and pass favourable orders please..

Anonymous said...

Increment between Feb and June : may be settled soon
It is learnt from sources that Govt. may decide to clear the increment issue between June and February as an one time measure in the meeting of the Anomaly Committee scheduled on 5th January 2012. This has been a long standing demand of the employees who lost one increment as a result of implementation of uniform increment date of 1st July after the sixth C.P

------www.paycommissionupdate.blogspot.com

A victory said...

Dear Sir,
we are the employee in one of the central govt dept under the min of I&B after commencement M A C P we are the top most looser who joined the dept after August 1984 as the prior employee has got 6600 G P and after they will get 7600 in next ACP where as we are at the 4800 G P and got 5400 in this M A CP and in next will get 5400 again. so this highly injustice with us being on the same post and same joining in the difference of only one month, we get great pinishment in future please look in to matter

Anonymous said...

Respected chairman and members of jcm
kindly take up the issue, of dni between feb to dec, again. if no other way is suitable to solve the problem then two dni should be opted e.g jan and july. I think this formula will have no discripancies.

Anonymous said...

To
ALL THE MEMBERS

PLEASE LOOK IN TO THE MATTER OF LOW PAID EMPLOYEES WITH HIGH RESPONSIBILITY HAVING WELL QUALIFIED AND PUT UP MORE THEN 20 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE. HAVING ALL THE ELIGIBILITIES ORDNANCE FACTORY BOARD HAS NOT DONE ANY NATURAL JUSTICE TO THESE EMPLOYEES. FURTHER INCERASED THE RESPONSILITY OF PRODUCTION AND ACCOUNTIBILTY AND AT THE SAME TIME THE PAY WAS BROUGHT DOWN VERTICALLY AND MERGED WITH JUNIOR MOST EMPLOYEES. THEY ARE junior works managers of ORDNANCE FACTORIES.ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH NO ORGANIZATION IS HAVING A 7 LINE MANAGERIAL STRUCTURE TO MONITER THE TWO GRADE SUPERVISORY STRUCTURE. PLEASE DO NOT SHOW ANY SYMPATHY TO THIS CADRE DO NATURAL JUSTICE. FROM III RD PAY COMMISSION ONWARDS THE PAY OF SUPERVISORY CADRE IS COMING DOWN AND IN 6TH PAY COMMISSION THE MOREALS OF THIS JWM CADRE WERE BURIED UNDER THE EARTH.

Unknown said...

Sir please take up the matter of increasing the grade pay of stenographers from 2400 to 4200 as this is the worst affected cadre who has to work aminimum of10 to12 hours with grade pay of 2400 is not justifiable.

barindra lal said...

BARINDRA LAL BOSE, AAO(COMMERCIAL)

Respected NAC members pl discuss the undermentioned matter in ur next meeting.
That Sir, I, Shri Barindra Lal Bose, Auditor promoted to Asstt. Audit Officer (Commercial)on 4.2.09 after passing the SOGE(Commercial) Part II Exam held on June 2008 and transferred to O/o the Pr. AG(Audit), West Bengal for which my basic pay was fixed rs.9300/- i.e. the minimum pay in the PB-2(rs.9300-34800) with Grade pay Rs.4800/-p.m. A batch of direct recruited AAO(Com) was joined the same office who is junior to me as per gradation list having basic pay Rs.13350/- i.e. the minimum entry level pay for that post w.e.f august 2010. Now my question is whether I may be allowed to stepping up of my pay at par with them in accordance with their date of joining i.e. august 2010 or not?

B.K. Thakur, Shubhashis Ckakraborty, Ashutosh Kumar said...

Dear JCM Members, this 6th pay commission as not made much difference between the pay scale of unskilled (group D)and LDC. Itis a request to raise the grade pay of LDC & UDCs/stenographers gr D of Central Government not only in CSSS/CSCS but also in subordinate offices of All over India.
In my personal view Grade pay LDC should be 2800/- and Grade pay of UDC and Stenographer Gr D should be 4200/-.

Anonymous said...

Sir, I request you to kindly remove the discrimination in the cadre of LDC & UDC and upgrade the GP 2400 for LDC and 2800 for UDC inlieu of GP 1900 & 2400 w.e.f. 01.01.2006.

Anonymous said...

To
All the Members,

sir, Please take up the matter regarding to the minimum entry pay on the basis of Grade pay, like direct entry. why should one employee will wait for the years for a stepping up of his/her pay ? And, what about where there is no direct entry. It means no direct entry and no stepping up. After merging three scales and putting them with minimum of pay in pay band is not appropriate for the promotees. They are losing a big amount per month in consideration with their just seniors, who fixed their pay scales as per on or before 31-08-2008. And above all this difference increase every six month which is creating a bad working atomsphere among the officials. Therefore it is requested to consider this anomaly on priority basis with the official side.

Anonymous said...

Dear Sir,
I am serving as Circle Organiser (Group-B Gazetted direct entry Executive Officer)with GP-4600/-&
1st MACP in GP-4800/- in SSB/MHA/
GOI.
We are Biggest looser/least advantegius post under GOI as we are getting GP-4600/-inspite of staus of group -B Gazetted.

It is important to mention that our collegues/CO's who have compeleted 12 yrs service as on 31.08.2009 have ACP in 5400/- & will get 6600/-& 7600/- in 2nd & 3rd MACP WHERE AS remaining CO's will be getting GP of 4800/-,5400/- in PB-2 &5400/- in PB-3 during 30yrs of service which denies the rule of SAME WORK-SAME PAY, Accordingly Anomaly arises to DARKEN our future .

Now you are requested to consider sympathetically our case andtake up with JCM/NAC sothat Anomaly in MACP may be settlled, However we have already lost a lot by getting GP of 4600/- inspite of being group -B Gazatted Officer with direct Entry through all india competition by erst while SSB ( Special Service Bureau) under CABINET SECTT /GOI

Sarvesh Kumar Yadav, CO/SSB/MHA

Email- sarveshyadav70@yahoo.in

Krishnamurthy said...

Respected Chairman and Members of Anomolly committee- there are glaring anomalies in implimentation of MACP. While the MACP benefits are granted for all the Group A,B and C employees , even higher income groups (HAG), the same is denied to the Group-A Organized on the execuse that they have been allowed the parity of 2 years on non-functional basis with the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). This is only in theory. Practically, the Group- A organized have neither been granted the parity nor the benefits of the MACP. As a result, the juniors are drawing more Grade Pay than the Seniors. Here is a classic case pertaining to Group-A Officers of Central Water Commission (Min, of Water Resources)

CASE-A (SENIOR AND HIGHER QUALIFICATION)
1) Jan 1973 Entered into Group –C Service (Junior Engineer),recruitment thru Employment Exchange. Qualification: Diploma
2) Aug-1984 Acquired higher qualification-i.e Graduate. Deptt- No incentive granted.
3) Nov 1989-Promoted to Group- B ( Asst.Engineer) .
4) Aug 1999 Granted 2nd ACP as per Vth PC.
5) Promoted to Group- A ( Asst. Executive Engineer) in Nov 1989.
Scale: 8000-13500
6) 6th PC, Scale: PB-3; 15600-39100, Gr. pay –5400, NO MACP benefits granted due to Group-A.Also not allowed the parity of 2 years on non-functional basis with the Indian Administrative Service (IAS).
Retired from Govt. Service on Superannuation in Jan 2011.
(Is it a SIN to be SENIOR and also acquire higher qualification while in service?)

CASE-B.(JUNIOR AND LOWER QUALIFICATION)
1) July 1978 Entered into Group –C Service (Junior Engineer),recruitment thru Employment Exchange. Qualification: Diploma
2) No up-gradation in qualification.
3) No promotion
4) Granted Ist and IInd ACP as per Vth PC.
5) No promotion, continued as JE.
6) 6th PC, Scale: PB-3; 15600-39100, Gr.Pay 6600/-Granted IIIrd MACP under VI th PC.

(Junior & Lower qualification- have been granted IIIrd MACP and granted higher Grade pay of Rs6600/-)

rakesh said...

Respected chairperson
Kindly discuss the matter of those employees whose Date of Next Increment was between Feb to Jun 2006 and take appropriate favourable orders as an one time measure. This is postponement of increment and it should not be happened. And the affected individuals are very much suffering during service and even on retirement. It is beyond to understand their mistakes for which they have not granted annual increments even after 13-17 months. So Kindly take favourable necessary action and discuss and obtain necessary favourable decision and orders. Thankyou.

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman & Members

Sir (s)

Recently Punjab Govt. granted Grade pay of Rs.2800/-& Rs.3200/-in the cadre of Clerk (LDC) in ratio of 50%:50% and also granted ACP 4-9-16 years of service. Is Centre is poor than Punjab State which cannot afford Grade Pay even equal to state Govt.

Rajesh

Rajesh said...

Respected Sir,

Recently Punjab Govt. revised the Grade Pay of Clerk (LDC) from Rs.1900 & Rs.2400/- to (Rs.2400/- & Rs.3200/-) in the ratio of 50:50 with ACP of 4-9-16 years respectively. Is Central Govt. is poor than State Govt. which cannot afford Grade Pay even equaivalent to State Govt.

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman and Members.
Kindly consider the plight of certain categories of employees in Dept. of Inf. Technology. Earlier there was cadre Rs.4500-7000 and the promotional cadre was Rs.5500-9000 and later Rs.6500-10500. However, just before the implementation of the RP, the cadre Rs.4500-7000 was merged with Rs.5500-9000. Due to this, those employees served in the cadre Rs.4500-7000 and got promoted to Rs.5500-9000 were not given any extra weightage. Once the Pay Scales were implemented, these two scales were put in to one Grade Pay RS.4200/- (in PB-2). Those who have worked more than 12 years were in the same Grade Pay of a new entrant/or those who are getting promoted from the pre-revised scale of Rs.4000-6000. This is a big anomaly and no one care about these categories of employees, since they are un organised.

It is a surprise to note that how the honorable members are so silent on this burning issue?

When the two grades of 5000 & 5500 were merged without any mercy how the honorable members are so silent in those meetings?

Don't you feel that initial grade pay Rs,4600 in the merged two grades of 5000 & 5500 is highly justified.

In the MACP, why Don't you feel that 8,16,24&32yrs is the right way to encourage the morale of the employees who are not getting the single promotion even after 26-28 years of sincere service?

Anonymous said...

Don't you feel initial grade pay should be Rs.4600/-?

Anonymous said...

Why Agenda Items for the meeting of National Anomaly Committee meeting (NAC) on 5 Jan 12 has not include DNI fall between Feb 2006 toJun2006 issue?

Anonymous said...

Respected sir,
Please read the comments on dated 21.12,2011 at time 9.34 PM for financial loss of library stream in term of Grade Pay under MACP as:-
Financial Up gradation/ APC Promotional Post Grade Pay/MACP Hierarchical Next Higher Grade Pay/ Net Loss in term of Grade Pay/ Pay Band.
With sincere regard.

varsha said...

Respected Commite members,

This is to bring to your kind notice thst many "group A" officers who belong to academic category does not know their status and they are being trated as non academic non teaching staff (like my case On paper in UGC I am an academic teaching staff (Technical Officer USIC) whereas my University JNU is not giving me all the benefits and grade pay for which I am entitled to)and UGC or even the concerned University is not revealing the list of said designations of the officers which come under "other academic staff of University.
As well UGC is trying to degrade the grace of Technical Officer Position ("Group A") to a lower grade by equifying them with S.O. and even the qualification too have been lowered. Only GOD knows what UGC is planning? whereas it is said everywhere even the LDC is coming up. Why this behaviour.
It is of utmost important issue for you to look into this. I will be thankful to you all for this anamoly.


Regards

Varsha Sharma
Technical Officer,
JNU, New Delhi

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman & Members,

This is the last hope for upgradation of the pay band and grade pay of ministerial staff ie. LDCs and UDCs.
Till date no one has taken up the case for upgradation of the pay of LDC and UDCs.
All are requesting for upgradation of the pay in respect of higher grades/posts but no is fighting with heart for the upgradation of the grade pay of LDCs & UDCs. This cadre is worstly affected during last two pay commissions. Besides the lesser pay, the new scheme of ACP has given more loss to this cadre.
You are also requested to take up the case for MACP to given the grade pay of next promotional post instead of next grade pay.

You are reqeusted to take up the case for upgradation of the grade pay of LDC to Rs 2800 and UDC to Rs 4200/- and also take up the case for meger of the post of LDC & UDC with grade pay of Rs 4200/-

Thanking you in anticipation.

Yours sincerely

Rajkumar Verma, LDC
Central Govt
and members of the

PRAMOD said...

Please discuss the matter in NAC to those employees whose DNI was between Feb to Jun 2006, and those who are retiring in the same period they also deprive with one increment even working for 11 months, whereas 6th CPC already recommended the increments benefits in completion of 6th month of service. If matter is not taken seriously, the affected individuals are very much sufferer during service and even on retirement. PRAMOD

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman,
LDC,UDC & ASST of SSB (SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL ) MHA are worst effected cadre after implementation of 6th cpc, presently grade pay of 1900, 2400 & 4200 for LDC,UDC ASST respectively given is very much discriminatory compare to other post of group D and B of BRO as well as other Deptt/CPMF. My personal opinion in this regard is that LDC post should given grade pay of 2800 and UDC is for 4200 and ASST is for 4600 just as other department where restructuring has already been done ie. Income Tax, EPFO etc, there is no uniformity in Central Government departments nowadays, because government has discriminatory attitude against non revenue departments of GOI like S.S.B which is and subordinate office of Ministry of Home Affairs.(GOI). Every Government employee and officer working in any Central department only for solely for the GOI, then why is so discrimination towards we people as the ministerial cadre is thought to be back bone of the departments . I HUMBLY REQUEST TO YOU ALL PLEASE LOOK INTO THESE MATTERS ON PRIORITY.

B.K. Thakur, Shubhashis Chakarbory, Amarjeet, Ashuthosh said...

Dear JCM Members, this 6th pay commission has not made much difference between the pay scale of unskilled (group D)and LDC. DoPT also said in reply of a RTI application that The issue regarding up gradation of the grade pay of LDCs & UDCs is being examined by the Anomaly Committee of the DOP&T (Letter No. 20/57/2010-CSII(A)Dated 31.1.2011) It is a request to raise the grade pay of LDC & UDCs/stenographers grade D of Central Government not only in CSSS/CSCS but also in subordinate offices all over India.
In my personal view Grade pay of LDC should be 2800/- and Grade pay of UDC and Stenographer Grade D should be 4200/-.

vimal kumar said...

RESPECTED CHAIRMAN AND ALL MEMBERS,

PLEASE PLEASE LOOK INTO THE MATTER OF LDC/UDCs GRADE PAY, THE MOST AFFECTED CADRE IN THE 6TH CPC, THIS IS THE ONLY PLATFORM WE ARE HOPING

Anonymous said...

RESPECTED CHAIRMAN AND ALL MEMBERS,

PLEASE PLEASE LOOK INTO THE MATTER OF LDC/UDCs GRADE PAY, THE MOST AFFECTED CADRE IN THE 6TH CPC, THIS IS THE ONLY PLATFORM WE ARE HOPING

SUNIL KUMAR said...

Please also discuss the MACP of Sr. Technical Assistant in Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture. As prior to 6th CPC the scale under ACP were as same as promotional hierarchy. The STAs in pre-revised scale of Rs 5500-9000 and 6500-10500 was getting Ist ACP at scale of Rs 8000 (revised GP 5400)and Rs.10000/- (revised GP 6600/) scale as second ACP. But now the person who gets his first ACP as Rs.6500/- that is the grade pay of Rs.4600/- will get his 2nd ACP as Rs.4800/- and third ACP as Rs.5400 GP and will never reach the pre revised scale of 8000 (revised GP ofRs.5400/-) and the person will get retire at the GP of Rs.5400/- and whereas the person who got his 2nd ACP of Rs.10000/- will get his 3rd ACP in the GP of Rs.12000/- and gap will go on. Please see to it and ensure that MACP will be in promotional hierarchy to provide career avenue of poor technical staffs of the ministries.
SUNIL KUMAR
New Delhi

Anonymous said...

Respected all friends,who are sufferer of MACP, due to which a cadre created within cadre. people are working in the same post getting different pay band and grade pay.worst hit are group-B gazetted Officers having grade pay of 4600/- after macp 4800/- their colleagues of the same rank and responsibility getting 6600/- or somewhere 5400/ grade pay but anomaly committee is not giving heed to this big problem. They are not thinking of the problem of the creation of cadre within cadre.Simple solution was to give group-B gazetted 5400/GP in PB-3 and group-B NGOs 5400/GP in PB-2 it will remove all anomaly. when they can change in TA rule, why can't they do this.Actually the members of Staff Side are getting hefty facilities from Govt.and not fighting for the real cause. They are simply making fool of us.Otherwise it is a nationwide problem in every deptt/ministry,people from the rank of LDC to Group-B Gazetted Officers are suffering.Why can't they make MACP on promotional hirarchy because it will end the anomaly and their job will be finished.
We all should come in a forum and create a twitter or facebook front against the ill will of Govt side and staff side both.Media will be attracted to highlight the issue. Else they will not think on right path because their close relatives are not facing the said problem.
Join for honour and dignity.

Anonymous said...

Agenda Item No. 5 Revised Pay Rules of National Anomaly Committee

(iv) Anomaly in fixation of pay of a direct recruit and promotee.
While applying Rule 8 of CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 the pay of direct recruits and new entrants is fixed at higher stage when compared to the existing employees who were promoted in the same grade, especially in PB-II with GP 4600/-. The anomaly should be removed by incorporating a provision that in case after 1.1.2006, if a promotee’s pay is getting fixed at a stage lower than that of a direct recruit as given in Section 2 of the First Schedule of the CCS (RP) Rules, then the pay of the promotee should be fixed at the same stage as that of a direct recruit/new entrant so that the existing employees pay is protected at par with the pay given to a new entrant. This was the demand of the Staff Side.
The official side had clarified that stepping up has been granted to bring senior promotees at par with directly recruited juniors. The stepping up will only remove the anomaly partially. The following needs to be considered: -
In case where there is no directly recruited junior available the promotee has to wait for a junior direct recruit to join and only after that he can ask for stepping up. The availability of direct recruit junior may take years and the person has to bear the unnecessary loss till a junior DR joins. Further, that stepping up would be only from the date the junior draws his pay – what about the period for which a person will work at an upgraded scale (higher post) but will receive less pay. Stepping up is provided in exceptional cases and not resorted to as a matter of principle. Secondly, in some cadres there is no direct recruitment to particular grades. In these cadres the stepping up is not possible since there is no direct recruit available.

Therefore the Staff Side should not agree with the contention of the Official side of granting of stepping up in this matter and demand that the anomaly should be removed by incorporating a provision “that in case after 1.1.2006, if a promotee’s pay is getting fixed at a stage lower than that of a direct recruit as given in Section 2 of the First Schedule of the CCS (RP) Rules, then the pay of the promotee should be fixed at the same stage as that of a direct recruit/new entrant so that the existing employees pay is protected at par with the pay given to a new entrant”.

sathyanandan said...

Respected sirs,
Kindly take up the matter of CMDs who were not granted the ACP scheme and take up the matter of merger of Grade I and Special grade and three grade structure of promotion after 9 years and 18 years. respectively as grade II and special grade.TIME BOUND PROMOTION may granted to Civilian Motor Drivers (Staff Car Drivers) as CMD Special grade forthwith who are completing 3 years in the grade of CMD grade I .
Or

The grade ratio of CMD (Special grade) may be revised into 40% instead of 5% with the implementation of three grade structure by merging the CMD Gde I and Special Gde into one grade in the ratio of 30:30:40 as the 40% senior most CMDs are having more than 24 years of regular service
we, feel that nobody understand our problem as the CMDs have no platform to submit problmes so kindly take up our case at least this time. we are facing financial loss since 1996.

Anonymous said...

Chairman, NAC
sir, you are requested to kindly look in to the matter of upgradation/merger of LDC and UDC. The cadre of LDC and UDC are worstly affacted in the present RRs specially the emplyees whose completed their 10 to 20 years of service. Because their maximum service period has aready passed without any promotion and remaining some period will be passed in the CHAKRAVIEW of RR 2008, if you not consider the upgradation/merger. Therefore you are again requested to kindly consider the upgradation/merger in view of their work/assignment/ responsibilities/qualification/ mode of recruitement.

Anonymous said...

after 6th cpc worst affected is clerks in all departments. govt should order parity for clerks as GP-2800 as entry, since there is only Rs100/- difference between old groupD and clerks. also MACP resulted in change of GP 100 only after waiting a long period of 10 years without promotion. a marginal increase should be given to thos whose increment falls between 2nd jan and July 2006. if not it is a great injustice to seniors andalso all allowances should be w.e. from 1-1- 2006 a great effect is to be made during next anomaly committee meeting

Anonymous said...

Resp.Chairman Sir and members,
LDC & UDC are the most effected officials in this pay commmision. I humbly request you to kibndly discuss the grade pay of LDC&UDC and boost up the grade pay of LDC as well as UDC positively. So, that LDC&UDC are the key role in civilian administration office4s. I look forward to the positive view.
The grade pay of LDC should be 2800 and UDC to be 4200. Already some of the department have fixed the grade pay of Rs.4600 for Assistants. I am strongly objecting present grade pay of LDC and UDC. When one LDC is selecting for the post after two tier examination and thereafter skill test he is drasing less grade pay than the constable (GP 2000) latter selecting on matriculation whereas one LDC with the Intermediate. When UDC is selecting with the minimum qualification Graduation their grade pay should be atleast 4200. Now a days the responsibilities of LDC and UDC is increaseed but their grade has not been upgraded. It is shameful to the Govt. when the peon is drasing 1800 grade pay and how it is justified the grade pay of LDC Rs.1900. Morever LDC&UDC of some of departments are doing stenographic duties (as most of the cases dealing the computers)in addition to their regular duties.Hene were are humbly requesting the govt. to upgrade the grade pay of LDC and UDC as early as possible.
I therefore, request the Staff Side Members to take up this issue seriously and effectively with the official side of the NAC and to place a favoaurable report before the govt. for immediate rectification of the anomaly. I strongly represent on behalf of the Clerical Staff and demand the following:
(a) The initial grade pay of the LDCs sholuld be Rs.2800/-
(b) The initial grade pay of the UDCs sholuld be Rs.4200/-
I would be very grateful the Secretary of the Anomaly Committee.
Thanks.

S.N.Sharma, Circle Organiser, SSB said...

I have been appointed as Circle Organiser in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) now under MHA, GOI in the pay scale of 6500-10500 (Group "B" Gazetted). As per ACP scheme we might have drawn GP of 5400 as 1st ACP but after 6th CPC I am drawing GP of 4800 as 1st MACP and will reach in GP of 5400 after 2nd MACP i.e. after putting 20 yrs of service in stead of 12 yrs of service as per ACP scheme. I am bearing not only financial loss of 8 yrs but also basic entitlements of GP of 5400 like TPT, Air entitlement etc. If the Anomaly Committee could not redress the vicious anomaly we may be allowed to draw GP as per promotional hierarchy under ACP scheme.

snsnmanjunath said...

Respected Sir,

On account of merger of scales group B Gazetted officers in central govt. is drawing Gr.pay Rs.4600/- compared to Group C who received MACP.(drawing GP Rs.4800/-and Rs.5400/-)in AIR/Doordarshan

Please remove this anamoly. Request that, All Group B Gazetted staff may be paid 5400/- GP
MN, BANGALORE

snsnmanjunath said...

Respected Sir,

It is brought to your notice that in our department the Gr. B. Gazetted Officers are paid GP.4600(AO) WHEREAS in some other minisrty these AO cadres were paid 5400/- GP . (Some of the Group C are getting higher GP of 5400/- through III MACP

Please remove this anamoly.

Anonymous said...

PLEASE PLEASE LOOK INTO THE MATTER OF Library & Information Asstt GRADE PAY, prsently in Ministry of Culture, Asstt. geting Rs. 4600/- and LIA Rs. 4200/- , Sir please look on this matter, we have double qualifications i. e. Graduation + Degree in library Sc. but we are geting Rs. 4200/- GP and Assistants getting Rs. 4600/- in Ministry of Culture

Praveen Dureja
Sangeet Natak Akademi
Ministry of Culture
New Delhi
Sa

Anonymous said...

Respected Sir,

i am a school teacher in delhi govt. appointed from march 2000
in the pay scale 5500-9000 in 6th cpc as on 01.01.2006 my pay fix as (6375*1.86)+4600= 16460 but a new Direct recruite on 01.01.2006 fix at 12540+4600=17140 in my cader Direct recruite joined in march 2008 and fix at 17140.if he joined on 01.01.2006 he draw 17140.but i am not fix at 17140 why my steppingup granting from 01.01.2006

Anonymous said...

If the issue of DNI between Feb and June(the crystal clear anomaly) is not going to be raised by the so called "leaders",then why don't we quit these unions?

Anonymous said...

Sir
The 60% of official have get their increment during the month from Feb to June are suffered loosing one increment due to implementation. WHEN THE OFFICIAL having increment during December get advanced to JULY, THOSE WHO GET INCREMENT FROM FEB TO JUNE were loosing one increment by postponing increment to 18 month ie NEXT JULY. RESULTING THIS ANOMALY THESE OFFICIAL loosing one increment for entire service and also entire life of Pension .Hence I request the concerned kindly settled this anomaly by giving increment advanced to Janury 1996

Anonymous said...

The Chairman, NAC
sir, I cannot understand that why do not take positive action in the matter of upgradation/merger of LDC & UDC while the facts like work assignment/responsibility/ Mode of appointment/qualifications etc. of the cadre knows very well. Therefore, I again request to you that please take action and fix the grade pay of LDC as 2400 and UDC as 2800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 and an order passed at the earliest so that the employee of the cadre are feel relax and motivation.

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman Sir and Hon'ble Member,
It is my humble request to all of you, please look into the matter regarding:
Semi-Professional Assistants in University Libraries and School Librarians minimum educational qualifications are equal; Work of job is same but grade pay different. This is big discrepancy in the pay scale/grade pay of Semi-Professional Assistants (SPA) in University Libraries, after implementation of 6th CPC.

Discrepancy in Up gradation in 6th CPC
Semi-Professional Assistants in University Libraries School Librarians
1. Pay Band PB-I (5200 - 20200) PB-II (9300 - 34800)
2. Grade Pay 2800
4600

The Semi-Professional Assistants in University Libraries are placed in Pay Band I (5200 - 20200) and the grade pay of Rs.2800/- and school Librarians placed in Pay band II (9300 - 34800) and the grade pay of Rs.4600/-.

Educational Qualification
Semi-Professional Assistants in University Libraries School Librarians
minimum educational qualification B.A/B.Sc/B.Com.+ B.Lib.Sc. B.A/B.Sc/B.Com.+ B.Lib.Sc.
It is stated that the Semi-Professional Assistants in University Libraries and School Librarians require minimum educational qualification (3 year Graduation degree + one year Professional degree)i.e .B.A/B.Sc/B.Com.+ B.Lib.Sc. Above minimum educational qualifications are equal, but grade pay different.
This big anomaly may kindly be looked into seriously. I request to the National anomaly committee (6th CPC) to render natural justice to the Semi-Professional Assistants (SPA) in University Libraries .Hence it is justified that the Semi-Professional Assistants in University Libraries deserve to be placed in the same grade pay.

Hopping for the favorable outcome in the next NAC meeting.

Vandana Agnihotri
Semi-Professional Assistants.

Anonymous said...

ORDNANCE FACTORY BOARD RECENTLY PROMOTED PS AND THE GRADE PAY AWARDED IS Rs4800/- WHICH IS Rs200/- JUMP AFTER 18 YEARS OF SERVICE. HENCE IT IS REQUESTED TO TAKE UP THE MATTER BY MEMBERS TO APPROPRIATE LEVEL IF NOT POSSIBLE TO DISCUSS IN THE 4TH MEETING TO BE HELD ON 5TH JANUARY 2012.

S J GANDHI said...

Resp. Members,

I request you all to get sanction of grade pay of POST in hierarchy for MACP scheme.
I served for 21 years on same post i.e from 1988 to 2009 as a technical officer. As I got two promotions earlier, I was not given any ACP benefit. Now only 200 Rs. upgradation with effect of MACP I am going to get such little difference in my grade pay. And this third upgradation too after completing totally 35 years of service.
I will be thankful if you get sanction from authority, heirarchy of Grade pay of POST for all three upgradations while applying MACP scheme.

Thank you,

S J Gandhi
Ahmedabad

Anonymous said...

Kindly take up the issue with the committee regarding fixation of Grade Pay of (Computer Programmers in PGIMER) Group B Gazetted Officers who are in 4600 Grade Pay are most effected because their junior DPA'B' (4200 grade pay) are merged in their scale (4600 Grade Pay) and also discuss following matter alike Section Officer and Group B Officer of other ministry.e.g. Ministry of Finance grant their Group B Officer the Grade Pay of 4800 and after 4 years 5400 but the Computer Programmer in Grade pay 4600 Group B Officers in Ministry of Health and family welfare, Government of India still continue with Grade pay of 4600 without any NFU.
Thanks and please raise the issue in next meeting.

Anonymous said...

Dear sir i am working in india meteorology department as SC.Asstt since last 26 years. Earlier 5000 and 5500 were permotional cadre now on merging i am in the same scale with G.P. 4200 and also a person who will join in 2012 will also in 4200 g.p. though under macp i am getting 4800 g.p. but it is very less as in other deptt in the same condition persons are getting 5400/6600 G.P. is it not unjustice with such staff. pl. take such issues with nac. solution is remove G.P.4800. after 4600 next G.P. should be 5400 on second MACP.
with regards P.K.Gupta

B.K. Thakur, Shubhashis Chakarborty, Krishan Kumar, Amarjeet, Ashutosh Kumar and other LDC/UDC/Stenographers said...

Dear JCM Members, this 6th pay commission has not made much difference between the pay scale of unskilled (group D)and LDC. DoPT also said in its reply of a RTI application that The issue regarding up gradation of the grade pay of LDCs & UDCs is being examined by the Anomaly Committee of the DOP&T (Letter No. 20/57/2010-CSII(A)Dated 31.1.2011) Please look into the matter of LDC/UDC/Stenopgraphers Grade pay not only in CSSS/CSCS but also in subordinate offices in all over India, the most affected cadre in the sixth pay commission. It is a request to raise the grade pay of LDC & UDCs/stenographers grade D of Central Government not only in CSSS/CSCS but also in subordinate offices all over India.
In my personal view Grade pay of LDC should be 2800/- and Grade pay of UDC and Stenographer Grade D should be 4200/-.

Anonymous said...

Sir,
6th CPC recommendations are implemented in Govt. of India and various Ministries and departments, and many Autonomous Organisations. But the same are implemented in Ministries like HRD and othe ministries are different ways. In JNV and KV TGTs are allowed PB 2 with GP4600 the same into Library Professionals with same qualifications are allowed PB2 with GP4200 in the same Ministry under NITs and IIMs are diferent to different. Pls tell What is the meaning of Educational Qualifications and what is the recommendations of 6th CPC?

Anonymous said...

Dear JCM Members, this 6th pay commission has not made much difference between the pay scale of unskilled (group D)and LDC. DoPT also said in its reply of a RTI application that The issue regarding up gradation of the grade pay of LDCs & UDCs is being examined by the Anomaly Committee of the DOP&T (Letter No. 20/57/2010-CSII(A)Dated 31.1.2011) Please look into the matter of LDC/UDC/Stenopgraphers Grade pay not only in CSSS/CSCS but also in subordinate offices in all over India, the most affected cadre in the sixth pay commission. Although the qualification of LDC/UDC/Stenographer for direct recruitment has been increased/changed/upgraded from Matriculation to Intermediate (10+2) but in respect of upgradation of its pay scale government has not taken any dicision till now. It is a request to raise the grade pay of LDC & UDCs/stenographers grade D of Central Government not only in CSSS/CSCS but also in subordinate offices all over India.
In my personal view Grade pay of LDC should be 2800/- and Grade pay of UDC and Stenographer Grade D should be 4200/-.

Prakash Shastri said...

NAC Meeting 05/01/2012
Agenda Item No. 44-
Sub-Anomaly in the Pay Scale / Pay Band and Grade Pay of Library Information assistants.

Respected Chairman Sir and Hon'ble Member of NAC/JCM, Kindly discuss above anomaly.

Library Information Assistants and School Librarians minimum educational qualifications are equal; nature of service is same but grade pay different. This is big anomaly in the pay scale/grade pay of Library Information Assistant (LIA), after implementation of 6th CPC.The Library Information Assistants are placed in the grade pay of Rs.4200/- and school Librarians placed in the grade pay of Rs.4600/-.

The above referred anomaly existed in the 5th CPC too. That is, school librarians were placed in the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000/-, where as the Library Information Assistants were given the pay scale of Rs. 5000–8000/- initially. After some time this anomaly was removed by the Ministry of Finance vide its Office Memorandum No. 71/3/2001-IC, dated 21. 2. 2002, and placed in the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000. Above pay scale implemented in railways RBE No. 204/2003 Railway Board letter No. PC-IV/2002/Imp/2 dated 27/11/2003.

It is stated that the Library Information Assistants and School Librarians require minimum educational qualification (3 year Graduation degree + one year Professional degree)i.e .B.A/B.Sc/B.Com.+ B.Lib.Sc. Above minimum educational qualifications are equal, but grade pay different.
This anomaly may kindly be looked into seriously. I request to the National anomaly committee (6th CPC) to render natural justice to the Library Information Assistants (LIA). Hence it is justified that the Library Information Assistants deserve to be placed in the grade pay of Rs. 4600/- (from 01/01/2006).

Hopping for the favorable outcome in the next NAC meeting.

Nilesh Kumar said...

To
The Chairman and Hon,ble Member NAC


Subject.: Adding of Professional Assistant in agenda Item No - 44 regarding the anomaly in the Pay Scale / Pay Band and Grade Pay of School Librarian and Library and Information Assistant in IITs Library System.

Respected Chairman Sir and Hon'ble Member,

We would like to draw your kind attention upon the agenda item no.- 44, which will be discussed on the next NAC meeting which is scheduled to be held on 05-01-2012. Sir, we are the Professional Assistants serving in the different Central Universities facing the same problem like the Library and Information Assistants in IITs. We would like to request you kindly discuss the matter regarding Library and Information Assistants and add the Professional Assistants with the School Librarian in agenda Item No. – 44.

The Comparative Pay Structure and qualification of School Librarians and Professional Assistants are as under:

School/Institution Post Qualification 5th CPC 6th CPC
School Library (KVS+NVS) School Librarian 3 year Graduation degree + one year Professional
degree)i.e.B.A/B.Sc/B.Com.+ B.Lib.Sc Rs. 5500-175-9000 Rs 9300-34800
GP-4600
University Library Professional Assistant MA /M.Sc. / M. Com. + B.Lib. Sc. or BA / B. Sc. / B. Com + M. Lib. Sc.
with 2 years experience.
Rs. 5500-175-9000 Rs. 9300-34800
GP-4200

Further this is to also inform you that the existing Recruitment and Promotion Rules of the most of the Central Universities, there is no provision for the carrier advancement for the serving Professional Assistants in University Library System but PAs were benefited with 8000-275-13500 and 10000-325-15200 after completion of 12 years and 24 years of their services respectively in 5th CPC. After implementation of 6th CPC, the Professional Assistants and Library and Information Assistants are placed in the grade pay of Rs.4200/- in University Library System and IITs and School Librarians have been placed in the grade pay of Rs.4600/-. MACP in 6th CPC has only provision to change the Grade Pay of Rs 4600, 4800 and 5400 after completion of 10, 20 and 30 Years of services respectively. This is not only the loss of money, effecting morale also.

In view of the above fact, you are kindly requested to please consider agenda item – 44 again and remove this anomaly so as to provide justice to the Library and Information Assistants and Professional Assistants.

Thanking you,
Sincerely yours
Professional Assistants

Anonymous said...

Sir Please see the Annex -III of the Resolution of the MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Deptt. of Expenditure) NEW DELHI issued on 29th August 2008 in which this annexure showing Recommendation of Sixth CPC which will be examined Separately
point no. 6 - Merger of All Accounts Services

In this connection, It is highlighted that I am working in a Autonomous Body in the pay scale 7450-225-11500 as per 5 th pay commission and the Board has granted me grade pay Rs. 4600 only as per 6 CPC against 7450-225-11500. Whearas the Organised Accounts Cadres got grade pay Rs. 4800 against old scale of 7450-11500.

It it my humbly request to kindly discuss this matter also

Thanks

Anonymous said...

Sir

It is very kindness of the Seniors who granted grade pay 4600 against the old scale of 6500-10500 but unfortunatly they have not thought about who have got grade pay 4600 against old scale of 7450-11500.

Kindly think about those employees who have working 7450-11500 but they demoted after granting grade pay 4600 against 6500-10500.


Thanks

Pushpendra Hada said...

Please discuss the MACP of Library staff As prior to 6th CPC, under the ACP scheme the pay were increase on the basis of promotional hierarchy. Therefore, a person got the payscale of Rs.6500-10500 on 1st ACP and Rs.10000-15200/- 2nd ACP. But now under the MACP Scheme the person who gets his first MACP as Rs.6500-10500 i.e the grade pay of Rs.4600/- will get his 2nd MACP as grade pay of Rs.4800/- and third MACP in the grade pay Rs.5400 and therefore, will never reach the scale of Rs.10000-15200(pre revised) and the person will retire on the GP of Rs.5400/- and whereas the person who got his 2nd ACP of Rs.10000-15200 (equivalent grade pay of Rs.6600 under 6CPC) will get his 3rd MACP in the GP of Rs.7600/-. Please see to it that MACP will be in promotional hierarchy.

Anonymous said...

Sir,
With the recommendations of 5th CPC, and D B Chathopadhyaya committee report accepted by the Govt. and issued OM for the common implementation of Library staffs in various ministries and departments, the said O M directed that Junior and Senior LIBRARY INFORMATION ASST.Scale of pay 5000-8000, 5500-9000 clubbed and upgraded the scale of pay 5500-9000,designated as Senior Library Information Asst.But Unfortunately the said O M did not implemented many departments, and denied the scale of pay for Library Professionals, Library Professionals having Degree in any subjects and Degree in Library Science also, In Central Secretariat and other Autonomous Orgn. Like NITs and IIMs an SSLC holder can Promoted Junior Superintendent post with 5500-9000 Scale of pay (Pre revised) 3 Years Diploma holder promoted Asst.Engineer, Foreman,Instructor , Supervisor and other Supervisory posts with 5500-9000 scale. But a Library Professionals denied these opportunities. Library Is the HEART of every Institute the Universities, Organisations,Library Professionals Provide latest Informations to our Scientists, Scholars, Who Knows about these facts? But somebody knows Like APJ Sir.

Velaga Kumari said...

Respected Chairman and Members of 4th anomaly committee,

The previous ACP Scheme was based
on “Promotional Hierarchy”. After 6th CPC, the MACP Scheme is based on Grade Pay Hierarchy. The Grade Pay has created many anomalies within a single cadre. It was informed that there are three sections in Central Water Commission in the Cadre of Assistant Director-II/SDE.

1. First Section.

Assistant Director-II/SDE who joined in the Department as Junior Engineer before August 1984 & who have already availed two up-gradations under ACPs on completion of 12/24 years with grade pay of Rs.5400/- and also availed 3rd financial up-gradation under the MACPs in the grade pay Rs.6600/- and also got arrears from 01.01.2006.

2. Second Section.

Assistant Director-II/SDE, who joined in the Department as Junior Engineer after August 1984 who have already availed one up-gradation under ACP after completion of 12 years of service, after that forcefully implemented the 2nd financial up-gradation after completion of 20 years of service under MACP with grade pay of Rs.4800/- w.e.f. 01.09.2008. Even, arrears have not been paid to the employees who have completed of 20 years of service before 01.09.2008. After that, 3rd MACP after completion of 30 years of service they will get only grade pay Rs.5400/-. The above affected cadre of AD-II/SDE will never get grade pay Rs.6600/-.

3. Third Section

Assistant Director-II/SDE who joined in the Department as Junior Engineer in the year 1999 and afterwards got promoted as Assistant Director-II/SDE with grade pay Rs.4600/-.

Giving magnanimous monetary advantage to part of the cadre and disadvantage to others and denying earlier individual representations saying the demand should come from entire cadre is unjustified as only the affected would represent the same but the beneficiary does not need.

This is quite discriminatory financial up-gradation among the same cadre – same work and is therefore quite anomalous. Hence, like First Section of AD-IIs, Second Section of AD-II’s and Third Section of AD-IIs also would want to allow the same system of scheme i.e. 12, 24 & 30 years basis i.e. 1st, 2nd ACP & 3rd MACP which will be more beneficial than that of 10, 20 & 30 years of MACP Scheme.

If 12, 24 & 30 years scheme is implemented among the same cadre, the said anomaly would be automatically removed to the satisfaction of every employee.

If the proposed scheme of 12, 24 & 30 years is not implemented, the anomaly could not be removed and the purpose/aim of the National Anomaly Committee to eradicate anomalies in the 6th CPC would not be fulfilled.
Hence it is requested to look into the matter for doing needful.
Thanking you sir,
Velaga Kumari, Assistant Director-II,CWC,Nagpur

Anil said...

Kindly sort out the matter of employees whose DNI was between Feb to June 2006. We were been punished without any mistake or crime. Even honorable courts acquit the criminals for lack of proofs/evidence and here we are punished for life for no crime or mistake. On the other hand some employees (Whose DNI was Aug to Dec 2006) were rewarded without doing anything extra by preponing DNI.

Anonymous said...

The difference in grade pay in certain stages is horrible. In case of promotion or example imagine a person getting third MACP is going from grade pay 4600 to 4800, the increase he gets is just 200. The reward for a person stagnating in the same post for 30 years without getting any promotion whose morale is at the lowest ebb being given this pittance is a point to be thought of by all level headed decision makers. So application of mind plus reasonable enhancement has to be given for slogging 30 years without any promotional benefits.

Anonymous said...

Respected Chairman Sir and Members as well, I am writing this mail just to remind to discuss the matter of AI for those employees whose DNI was between Feb and Jun 2006. As these employees are worst sufferer because of getting there AnnualIncrement in that period after 17,18 months and so on (which was due after 12 months) for no fault of them except of the faulty policy of VIth Pay Commission.

satinder kumar

Ravi K. Varre said...

Respected Chairperson and Members, NAC
Some of Group-A officers on direct recruitment are stagnating in the same post due to isolated posts in various departments without any promotional avenues with only source of MACP for financial upgradation. For those employees, is it not appropriate to think for modifying/ curtailing period under MACP scheme to those under privileged in career development or to shift them to deficient departments of staff for same posts so that they will get promotion avenues.

Anonymous said...

respected chairperson and members, NAC
sir,
may kindly be discussed for the post of sub-inspector , in Vth pay commission grant 5500-9000 and vi th pay commission upgraded grade pay 6500-10500 with GP 4200. after that the mof ordered on 13-11-2009 and grant the GP 4600. but the decision is not implemented in MHA.
so please discussed.

Anonymous said...

Respected chairpersons and members of NAC
I want to draw yr kind attention towards anomaly arises due to upgradation of 6500-10500 to 7450-11500 In those department where there was earlier permotion cadre were 6500-10500 to 7500-12500 like India Meteorological Department where a person has to spend about 28 years service to get permotion from GP 4200 to GP 4600 and 5-8 years from 4600 to 4800(pre revised 7500-12500)
since in some othr department people get permotion from gp 4200 to 6600/7600 dring the same period i mean in some department permotion prospects are very poor also some departments have anomaly that some staff in the same department got 6600/7600 gp nder old ACP before pay commission and others are in Gp 4800/5400 by new MACP so it is great anomaly to remove. In my openion GP 4800 should be abolished. this will atomatcally setteled all issues related staff and ths staff like IMD will also be benifitted who got permotion after a long time.
I think pay commision g idelines also spport eqality to all staff.

Anonymous said...

Respected chairpersons and members of NAC
I want to draw yr kind attention towards anomaly arises due to upgradation of 6500-10500 to 7450-11500 In those department where there was earlier permotion cadre were 6500-10500 to 7500-12500 like India Meteorological Department where a person has to spend about 28 years service to get permotion from GP 4200 to GP 4600 and 5-8 years from 4600 to 4800(pre revised 7500-12500)
since in some othr department people get permotion from gp 4200 to 6600/7600 dring the same period i mean in some department permotion prospects are very poor also some departments have anomaly that some staff in the same department got 6600/7600 gp nder old ACP before pay commission and others are in Gp 4800/5400 by new MACP so it is great anomaly to remove. In my openion GP 4600 and4800 should be merged. this will atomatcally setteled all issues related staff and ths staff like IMD will also be benifitted who got permotion after a long time.
I think pay commision g idelines also spport eqality to all staff.

p k gupta

Shaik Rukman said...

Respected Sir,

After implementation of 6th Pay commission the worst effected group is LDC/UDC, Government has recommended 75% directo recuitment in the posts of Assistant. What about LDC and UDC's who are waiting since 15 to 20 years event thery are well qualified (Graduates and post graduates0 1st upgrade all the LDC and UDC who are in service who are graduate and post graduate.

LDC,UDC & ASST of BRO (GREF) are worstly effected cadre after implementation of 6th cpc,presently grade pay of 1900, 2400 & 4200 for LDC,UDC ASST respectively given is very much discriminatary compare to other post of group D and B of BRO as well as other Deptt/CPMF. My personal opinion in this regard is that LDC post should given grade pay of 2400 UDC is for 2800/4200 and ASST is for 4600 just as other department where restructureing has already been done ie. income tax, epfo etc,there is no uniformatiy in central government departments nowdays, because government has discrimanatry attitude against non revenue departments of GOI like BRO. Every govenemnt employee and officer working in any Central deparment only for soloely for the GOI, then no reason for discrimanation. I HUMBLY REQUEST TO YOU ALL PLEASE SETTLE THESE MATTERS ON PRIORITY.

Thanks.

Smart said...

Please discuss the MACP of stenographer grade D. Prior to 6th CPC the scale under ACP were as same as promotional hierarchy. the staff who were in the pay scale of Rs. 4000-6000/- (now Grade Pay 2400) have been promoted in the 1st ACP in the pay scale of Rs.5000-(now Grade Pay 4200). But under MACP I have given Grade pay of Rs. 2800 i.e. huge difference of Rs.1800/0 in promotional hierarchy. It is requested that kindly look into the matter and ACP will be scheme will be implemented at the earlier to avoid the monetary lost to the stenos who have given GP 2800 under MACP or they should be upgraded to the earlier scale of 5000/- (now grade pay 4200).

The DOPT has also issued a notification for grant of grade of Rs.4200/- to CCS Staff but for the autonomous organization and other central government departments, the said grade pay is not implemented.

Kindly look into the matter and the same may be taken up in the ensuing meeting of anomaly committee.

Thankx

Smart said...

Sir,

I am presently working in an autonomous organization of MHRD. I am Stenographer Grade D in the grade pay of Rs.2400/-. After completion of 10 years service I got my first ACP in 2010 and was granted next grade pay of Rs.2800/- with an increment.

Earlier, under the ACP scheme of 5th pay commission, i was eligible for promotional heirarchy but in the 6th pay commission, I am in great financial loss and likewise my other colleagues were also in great loss.

The DOPT has also granted NFSG of Rs.4200/- to the stenographers Grade D of CCS. This is a great partiality to the employees.

Kindly take up the matter with Government of India so that the affected employees like me can get the benefit.

thanks

Raman said...

Regarding Date of Next Incremnet NAC agenda item No.5(v)
Is this also valid for those whose data of Joining falls between 02-01-2006 and 30-06-2006 because they got their first increment after about 13-18 months( If some one joined on 02-01-2006 then she/he would have got his 1st increment after about 18 months).

Please clear this point.

Also If these employees have not been included in this agenda item then this should be treated a new anomly that should be answered immediately while resolving this agenda item.

dr. nik said...

respected sir,

Grade pay issue of LDC and UDC seems to be still far to be solved,,,,,, government is just concerned wit increasing the pay of MPs they have no time to think abt the poor clerical cadre,,,,,, respected all representatives we need to take up this case to the government in some other way,,,,, LDC and UDC must brings in PB-2 9300-34800 GP 4200,,,,,, the cadre is having very key role in functioning of department,,,,,, please raise the issue once again,,,,,,,,

LIST OF CGHS HOSPITALS
1. ALLAHABAD 2. AHEMDABAD 3. Bangalore 4. Bhubhaneshwar 5. Bhopal
6. Chandigarh 7. CHENNAI 8. Delhi 9. Dehradun 10. Guwahati
11. Hyderabad 12. Jaipur 13. Jabalpur 14. Kanpur 15. Kolkata
16. Lucknow 17. Meerut 18. Mumbai 19. Nagpur 20. Patna
21. Pune 22. Ranchi 23. Shillong 24. Trivandrum 25. Jammu.
7th CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION NEWS
TITLEDATEARTICLESORDERS
7TH CPC REPORT AND THE NEED FOR TIMELINESS16.04.20147thCPC Blog
DID YOU KNOW HOW THE 6TH CPC MULTIPLICATION FACTOR OF 1.86 WAS DERIVED..?15.04.201490Paisa
EXPECTED PAY STRUCTURE OF 7TH CPC10.04.201490Paisa
Date of submission of 7th CPC Report05.04.2014-Rajya Sabha
Comments and Suggestions on 7th CPC04.04.201490Paisa
A webpage has been created by the Ministry of Finance for 7th Central Pay Commission24.03.2014-Finmin
Federations veiws on the ToR of 7th CPC05.03.2014AIRF/BPMS/IRTSA
Cabinet approved 7th Central Pay Commission Terms of Reference28.02.201490Paisa
Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission04.02.201490Paisa
NO COMPROMISE ON TERMS OF REFERENCE07.12.2013NFPE
Possible ToR meeting with Staff Side JCM-Dopt19.11.2013Dopt
7th CPC Date for implementation11.10.20137thcpcnews
Press Statement of Confederation of 7th CPC25.09.2013Confederation
Consent given by PM for 7th CPC25.09.201390Paisa
RETIREMENT AGE 62
HEADLINESDATEOUR BLOGOTHER BLOGSOTHER MEDIAS
Retirement age of 65: The Politicization of Employees’ Demands11.04.201490Paisa--
Retirement age to 62-What is the background behind this news?01.03.201490Paisa--
50% DA Merger and Retirement age almost disappeared from CG Employees Diary...!07.03.2014-GServants-
High hopes fading due to announcement of election dates...05.03.2014-Karnmk-
Proposals of Retirement age 62 and 50% DA Merger..?01.03.2014-GServants-
Retirement Age 62 - Cabinet expected to clear on Friday (28.202014)26.02.201490Paisa--
Retirement Age 62 – Cabinet is likely to clear some of these demands..!25.02.2014-PCUpdate
Proposal for raising Retirement Age to 62 waits for Cabinet Nod17.02.2014-GServants-
Parliamentary panel urged to raise the retirement age to 65 years08.02.2014--TOI
Retirement Age 62 : Govt not considering to raise retirement age to 6218.08.2013-PTI
Retirement age 62 – No hike in Retirement age of Central Government employees…15.08.2013-CGEN.in-
Retirement Age 62 - Prime Minister likely to declare on his Independence Day speech14.08.2013-CGEN.in-
Retirement Age of High Court Judges23.08.201390Paisa--
Retirement Age 62 – Cabinet decision to increase retirement age deferred03.08.2013--B.Standard
No plan to increase retirement age of employees16.06.2013--PTI
Pros and cons of raising the retirement age of Central Government Employees09.06.2013-EOrders-
No decision on central staff retirement age on cabinet meeting05.06.2013-PCUpdate-
Retirement age to be extended by 2 years to 6204.06.2013--FExpress
Increase retirement age of government employees to 6230.05.2013--ET
Union government wants retirement age 6229.05.2013--Rediff
No proposal to enhance the retirement age from 60 to 62 years08.03.201390Paisa--
Call to increase retirement age of bank employees to 6504.02.2013--Hindu
Retirement age of Central Government Employees20.01.201390Paisa--
Retirement age of faculty doctors from 65 to 70 years…03.12.201290Paisa-
Enhancement of superannuation retirement age of KV teachers31.08.201290Paisa-
Retirement age of Teachers and Lecturers26.08.201290Paisa--
Cabinet today approved the proposal to enhancement of age of superannuation of teachers to 6521.07.2012--PIB
Retirement age across the world - ILC Report10.07.2011--Global
Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed05.09.2010--PTI
PIL on retirement age of civil servants 25.09.2010--PTI

Disclaimer

90 Paisa News : As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post.

All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog.


Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only.

90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Any suggestions write to us
90paisa2008@gmail.com


Related Posts with Thumbnails