Enter Keyword and Search





Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Port and Dock Workers To Go For Action If Settlement Delayed

with 3 comments


All the major five workers’ federations affiliated to HMS, CITU, AITUC and INTUC, representing overwhelming majority of the Port & Dock workers all over the country expressed anguish over the extreme delay and non-settlement of wage-revision of the workers owing to negative attitude of the Port & Dock management.
In a joint letter issued to Shri G K Vasan, Minister of Shipping, Govt of India on 12th August 2009 the Federations urged upon urgent intervention to ensure a favourable settlement within two weeks time, failing which the federations will be compelled to resort to direct action including indefinite strike in all the ports and dock of the country.
The letter to minister was jointly signed by
M K Pandhe (CITU)
S R Kulkarni (HMS)
S K Shetye (HMS)
VKB (AITUC) and
C Kalan (INTUC)

Text of the Federations letter is given below
Dear Shri Vasan,
We are extremely sorry to note that despite of more than 2.5 years after the expiry of the agreement and 19 meetings of the BWNC, the wage negotiations in Ports and Docks for wage settlement could not be arrived at. This is causing strong resentment amongst the workers. The Bi-partite Wage Negotiation Committee meeting held on 12 August 09 also failed to resolve the crisis.
We wish to note that the Govt. should intervene into the matter for a favourable settlement within two weeks, failing which the trade Unions will be left with no other option but to resort to direct action including indefinite strike in all the Ports. We hope you will appreciate the gravity of the situation and ensure that long pending settlement is arrived at without any further delay.

Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
HMS
CITU
AITUC
INTUC

Source: CITU Centre

Related Posts Based on Your Search

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

welldone for joint action committee

Anonymous said...

This decision should have taken earlier, mostly before election, why the five federations deleyed to take such decesion.

vijay said...

IF place of illness is other than the place of serving employee who is under CS(MA) benefits....and there is no AMA also ...then who is competent to give the referral or equivalent to the AMA



Quick Links (O & P)

OBC OFB OHD Bank Notes One day Strike One Increment Arrears one rank-one pension Option Form Ordnance Employees Ordnance Employees Federations Ordnance Factories OROP OROP Anomalies OROP Arrears OROP Arrears Calculator OROP Calculation OROP Formula OROP Notification OROP Tables Outcome of NAC meeting Overtime Allowance Paid Holiday Pan Card paramedical staff Paramilitary Foreces Parents Care Leave Parliament Matters Parliamentary Committee Pass Issue Paternity Leave Patient Care Allowance Pay and Allowances Pay Arrears Pay Commission Pay fixation Pay Hike Pay in the Pay Band Pay Matrix Table Pay Matrix Table for CG Employees Pay Matrix Table for Defence Personnel Pay Revision Pay Structure Pay under FR 35 PBOR PC of A(Fys) Pcafys Orders PCDA Orders penalties and Disciplinary Pension Pensioners Issues Pension Arrears Pension Disbursing Authority Pension Disbursing Process Pension Option Pension orders Pensionary Benefits Pensioners Pensioners Association Pensioners Portal Orders Pensioners Portal Orders 2012 Pensioners Portal Orders 2013 Pensioners Portal Orders 2014 Pensioners Portal Orders 2015 Pensioners Portal Orders 2016 Persmin Person with Disabilities Personal Assistant PF PF Interest PFRDA PFRDA Circulars Pharmacists PIB News PLB Bonus Postal Department Postal Employees Postal Strike Prasar Bharati Pre-2006 Pensioners PRIS Private Airlines Private Hospitals Probation Period Productivity Linked Bonus Promotion Promotional Hierarchy promotional increment Promotional Quota Provident Fund PSU PSU Employees Public Holidays Public Provident Fund Qualification for LDC

Quick LInks (Q & R)

Recent Posts

Disclaimer:As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only. 90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.