Enter Keyword and Search

Flash News : Non-Productivity Linked Bonus (Ad-hoc Bonus) to the CG Employees - Finmin Orders

Grant of Grade Pay of Rs.4600 to the post that exists in the pre-revised scale of Rs.6500-10500 as on 01.01.2006

with 11 comments

Head Office
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan
www.efpindia.gov.in : www.epfindia.nic.in

No. HRD/2(3)82/EO-AO/Pt-III/43140

Dated: 19 Oct 2010

All Additional Central P.F. Commissioners,
All Regional P.F. Commissioner (I) In-Charge of the Regions,
All Regional P.F. Commissioner (II) In-Charge of the SROs.

Subject: Grant of Pay Structure of Grade Pay of Rs.4600 in PB-2 to the post that exists in the pre-revised scale of Rs.6500-10500 as on 01.01.2006 which were granted the Normal replacement Pay Structure of Grade Pay of Rs.4200 in the PB-2.

Please refer to this office letter No. HRD/1(2) 2008/Implementation of 6th CPC/16306 dated 17.03.2010 on the subject mentioned above wherein Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- in place of Rs.4200/- was allowed to the cadre of EO/AO.

In this circular, it was further clarified that as per the H.O. letter NO. HRD/1(a)2003/Pay scales/Pt.II/60951-6500-10500 notionally w.e.f. 1/04/2004 with actual financial effect from 1/9/2007, therefore the financial benefits in accordance with the DoPT circular in the cadre of EO/AO shall be effected w.e.f. 1/09/2007 onwards.

In this regard, it is to state that it has come to the notice of the Head Office that while implementing the above mentioned order of granting Grade Pay of Rs.4600/- to EO/AO, the benefit of pay fixation has also been extended by some regions, either by giving increment or by fixing the basic pay corresponding to pre-revised pay scale of Rs.7450-11500/- by using fitment table. This is totally erroneous and against the spirit of the order.

It is once again clarified that the aforesaid letter permits the grant of only Grade pay of Rs.4600 in place of Rs.4200 and no benefits of pay fixation i.e. grant of any increment of fixation of pay using fitment table corresponding to pre-revised scale of Rs.7450-11500/- are to be given in this regard. If such benefits have been given, then the recovery of the excess amount should immediately be effected and an action taken report be sent to this office by 29th October 2010 positively.

Yours faithfully

Regional P.F. Commissioner (HRM)

Click here to get original order...

Related Posts...


Anonymous said...

Pay fixation formula as suggested by EPFO regarding fixation into Grade pay Rs.4600/- is totally erroneous and not consistent with Finance ministry U.O note 10/1/2010-IC dated 27.1.10 which allows fitment table of Rs.7450.
RH SAHU,Ministry of Labour,Rourkela

Ranjana said...

Fire Fighting Staff Uniform revised orders

mahesh sharma said...

sir, I am Mahesh Sharma employee in Home Ministry AS Assistants and PAs were with the scale of Rs.5500 But now there scale is enhanced/equal to Rs.6500/-(ACIO-I).IT is unfare with scale of Rs.6500.Those got Rs.5500 basic earlier. now getting G.P 4200/-(ACIO-II).AS ASSISTANTs got G.P-4600, our ACIO-II THOSE GETTING G.P-4200 MUST BE KEPT GP-4600 AND THOSE HAVE RS.6500/(ACIO-I)GP-4600 MUST ENHANCED WITH GP-4800/.THEN THE THINGS WOULD BE JUSTIFIED.

Anonymous said...

binil m.s. says it is unjust to keep the acio-ii(mha) in gp -4200/- as pa and assistant have been increased to gp 4600/-

Anonymous said...

it is unjust to allow the acio-ii of ib the gp of 4200/-. it should be 4600/-

Anonymous said...

why is here anamoly in the pay of assistants,pa and ACIo-ii of IB(MHA), where all were in same pay stucture before 6th pay commission.
assistants, PA are given 4600/- garde pay, where as ACIO-I s are allowed only 4200/-gp. a large gap between salaryrange. Is it really a democratic and independent country or a country with equal opportunity as frequently uttered by law makers,politician overall the govt.

Anonymous said...

why govt. is thinking twice to increase the gp of ACIO-II(IB)from 4200/- to 4600/-

Anonymous said...

why govt is thinking twice to hike the gp of IB's ACIO-II from 4200/- to 4600/-

Anonymous said...

name- mohammed israr ahemad
Respected sir kindly help me
I was Appointed as LDC on 21/5/75

1) I got 1st promotion as UDC w.e.f 1/10/80.
2) 2nd pro as ASSTT. Store keeper wef 8/9/94 (pre revised) 5000-8000, revised rs 9300-34800 with GP rs 4200.
3) 3rd pro as SK wef "19/2/2008" pre revised scale 5500-9000 which revised az 9300-34800 with GP rs 4200.

As per recommendations of the revised pay scale of 6th CPC the pay bend & GR pay of asstt store keeper & store keeper have been merged and both the posts are having same pay structure & grade pay ie 9300-34800 with grade pay of rs 4200.
Thus my third pro ie ASK to Sk wef 19/2/08 was in the same scale of pay & grade pay & due to this merger no pay fixation benefit was given to me being same grade.
Thus my third promotion which if from 19/2/08 has become "NULLIFIED".


Please reply me sir, whether I am entile for 3rd MACP wef 1/9/08 in PB 9300-34800 with GP 4600.

Thanku sir, am waiting for your.
Plz reply
My mail add is
Mob. No. 9993338414

krishnamurthy said...

Sir I got 2 Macps from the date of sixth pay commission my basic was on jan 2006 is 7500/- in the pay scale [6500-10599 grade 200 increment ] in the ne grade pay was at that time i.e jan 2006 4800/.And I got A macp in the grade pay 5400 on 1st.Oct 2007, and 2nd MACP on 1st. jan 2012 in the grade pay is 6600 . present my basic pay is including G P 25700 how much I am going to be fixed and arrears, I am not staying in the quarters and I am a P H candidate I am getting T A double So plz Help me the Hole caluculations plz thanking u sir this is my mail I D pkmurthy2957@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

Why acio ii grade pay has not been increased from 4200 to 4600

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Today's Recent Entries...

Disclaimer:As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only. 90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Recent Posts