Enter Keyword and Search



RECENT STORIES...

Can the Seventh Pay Commission recommend the lowering of retirement age for Central Government employees?

with 3 comments
Can the 7th Pay Commission recommend the lowering of retirement age for Central Government employees?

“The unconfirmed information says that the 7th Pay Commission is planning to bring about a dramatic change in the retirement age of Central Government employees.”

Yet another news story about the retirement age of Central Government employees surfaced yesterday. The reputed English news website of India Today featured a special article yesterday about the 7th Central Pay Commission. In the article, the 7th Pay Commission is likely to reduce the retirement age to 55 or on the completion of 33 years, whichever comes first.

This has raised the question in the minds of many if the Pay Commission has the authority to recommend the reducing of retirement age.

The Pay Commission has all the authority to present its explanations and recommendations about changes in the retirement age of Central Government employees. But, the Centre has the discretionary powers to either accept or reject the recommendations. The fifth Pay Commission recommended that the retirement age be increased. Based on the recommendation, the government increased the retirement age from 58 to 60, in May 1998(Click to view the Dopt Order). The Third Pay Commission also recommended the date of retirement of Central Government employees. The commission recommended that the retirement effect from the afternoon of the last day of the month in which the employee concerned attains the age of superannuation instead of the afternoon of the actual date of his superannuation(Click to view the Dopt Order). But, for now, there’s no confirmed news about the recommendation of reduction in retirement age.

Initially it was 60 years of age or 33 years of service, then it changed as 58 or 33 years service and now it becomes as 55/33 years. Though many are ready to even accept the changes in retirement age, what is unpalatable for them is the idea of linking the years of service with their age. If a talented employee joins the Central Government services at a very young age, then he is likely to lose up to seven years of service tenure.

All the government employees, especially those above the age of 40, are vehemently opposing the idea. The questions they are putting forth are –



   
   
Related Posts...

3 comments:

Lakshmanrao seshagiri said...

As per the existing Rules,the Retirement Age is 60 years...Till the Rule is amended,the existing Rule of Law is the reasonable answer..

sandip kumar de said...

Would be beneficial to all employees irrespective of their joining in late, either due to stringent and lengthy recruitment process or pursuing academic endeavors in higher education. It also appears that highly educated peoples usually come in late for joining to a job, even deployed to a far more inferior category jobs than for which he deserve actually.
Therefore, the employees joined in late can not be deprived from their usual period of 33 years of service. So upper limit should be 65 years to compensate the length-of-service (33 years) equally to all the employees. Thereby more rational and secured decision to be established for the foreseeable future. Nonetheless, younger generations will get a good chance to perform and to act with a digital vision.
Several explanations are due in this regard to explain the above statement and upper limit must be 65 years, as average expectancy of life have become very high, when compare to earlier century.

ARUN GIRI said...

Arun Kumar

Sir

MSP should be same as for all ranks since everybody is doing military service and has same 24 hours time in a day. Other wise it should be on rankwise.



Disclaimer

90Paisa - Dedicated to Central Government Employees and Pensioners. As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only. 90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Recent Posts