Enter Keyword and Search






Saturday, January 23, 2016

Grant of MACP benefit in the promotional hierarchy – Copy of the stay order dated 08.08.2014 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court

with 1 comment
Grant of MACP benefit in the promotional hierarchy – Copy of the stay order dated 08.08.2014 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court

References/Representations/Court Cases in various Ministries/Departments/Organisations for grant of MACPS benefits in the promotional hierarchy – reg.

No. 22034/04/2013-Estt.(D)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel Public Grievance & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training

North Block, New Delhi
Dated: 20.01.2016

Office Memorandum

Subject :- References/Representations/Court Cases in various Ministries/Departments/Organisations for grant of MACPS benefits in the promotional hierarchy – reg.

The undersigned is directed to forward herewith a copy of the stay order dated 08.08.2014 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in CC No. 8271/2014 (converted to SLP No. 21803/2014) in the matter of UOI Vs. Shri M.V. Mohanan Nair on the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in OP(CAT) No. 2000/2013(Z) regarding grant of MACP benefit in the promotional hierarchy, for information.

sd/-
(Gayatri Mishra)
Director (E-I)

Authority: www.persmin.gov.in

Related Posts...

1 comments:

Krishna Seshadri said...

The VII CPC REPORT IS ON THE TABLE OF THE GOI...NOW , IT is for THE GOI TO DO WHAT THEY want? My views expressed can be read in MY ARTICLE..." VII CPC REPORT" PUBLISHED IN LCI...LAWERYS CLUB OF INDIA ...ON 28-12-2015... I HAVE POINTED OUT LOTS OF DIFFRRENTIAL EQUATIONS SOPTED BETWEEN THE C.G. EMPLOEES, DEFENCE PERSONNEL AND THE HOME MINISTRY???FOR EXAMPLE...FOR DSC, IT RECOMMENDED FOR 8/16/24 MACP... WHILE FOR OTHERS IT REMAINED AS ,10/20/30??? THIS CAN BE MADE AS 8/16/24/30!!!! THE PRESENT DoP& T OMs on ACP/ MACP IS MOSTLY USEFUL AND CAN BE APPLIED UNDER HODs/ MINISTRY CHOICE,,, DIFFERENT PARAS CAN BE APPLIED DIFFERENTLY AS PER THEIR CHOICE???
FOR EXAMPLE...IN RAILWAYS...RPF..SAY ..ONE INSPECTOR WHO REFUSES PROMOTION TWICE, FORCASC, GROUP..A..POST, AND REMAINED AS INSPECTOR TILL RETIREMENT IN GRADE PAY OF Rs.5400/-/ ACP IS GIVEN GROUP.A. CDRE GRADE PAY OF Rs.6600/-; WHILE SOME ADHOC ASCs given Grade pay of Rs.6600/- under zMACP!!! CAN RAILWAY BOARD,DG,RPF SAY THEY RECEIVED FINANCIAL COMMSR. APPROVAL, SANCTION AND REFERRED TO FC OR NOT??
AGAIN, SOME INSPECTORS IN GRADE PAY OF Rs.4600/- given Rs.4800/- and not grade pay of Rs. 5400/- as per RPF SCALES/ GRADE PAYS, THERE IS NO GRADE PAY OF Rs.4800/- in RPF , BUT THE SAME..Rs5400/- under MACP.. TWO TYPES OF FORMULAE APPLIED IN RPF???THIS IS WHAT YOU CAN READ AND INTERPREATE AS PER YOUR CHOICE IN RPF???
GOOD NEWS THAT THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT GIVEN STAY ORDER IN ACP/ MACP ISSUE???



Disclaimer:As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog. Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only. 90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Recent Posts