PROPOSED PAY STRUCTURE OF 7TH CPC-NC JCM STAFF SIDEEXPECTED DA JAN 2015- THE NEXT EPISODE BEGINS...
EXPECTED PAY SCALE OF 7TH PAY COMMISSIONEXPECTED DA JAN 2015 - AICPIN FOR SEPTEMBER 2014

HOT NEWS...
AIR TRAVEL CONCESSION EXTENDED FOR FURTHER TWO YEARSNATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE NC JCM STAFF SIDE TO BE HELD ON 11TH DECEMBER 2014
CONFEDERATION WRITES TO NC JCM REGARDING DA MERGER & INTERIM RELIEFAIRF PROPOSED PAY SCALE - MEMORANDUM TO 7TH CPC
NFIR PROPOSED PAY STRUCTURE OF 7TH PAY COMMISSION NATIONAL CONVENTION WILL ADOPT A JOINT RESOLUTION ON DA MERGER, INTERIM RELEIF
MEDICINES UNDER CGHS ISSUED FOR 6 MONTHS AT A TIME - CGHS AMENDMENT ORDERS LATEST LIST OF HOSPITALS & REVISED PACKAGE RATES WITH EFFECT FROM 1.10.2014
TRANSPORT ALLOWANCE & TRAVELLING ALLOWANCE RULES AT A GLANCE... PROTEST AGAINST BIO-METRIC ATTENDANCE SYSTEM FOR CG EMPLOYEES
LIST OF CGHS HOSPITALS IN 25 CITIES ALLOVER INDIA KOLKATA NIZAM PLACE READY FOR BOOKING ONLINE FOR TOURING OFFICIALS
GRANT OF HRA ON TRANSFER ONE STATION TO ANOTHER STATION 1 HOUR IN HOUSE WEEKLY TRAINING FOR ALL GROUP OF CG EMPLOYEES
4200 GP TO LAB TECHNICIANS EFFECT FROM 1.1.2006 NEED A DIRECTION FROM CENTRAL FOR INTERIM RELIEF - 7TH PAY COMMISSION
IS INTERIM RELIEF LIKELY TO CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES..? OROP - ONE RANK ONE PENSION - ORDERS & NEWS
EMPLOYMENT NEWS-LOT OF LATEST JOB OPPORTUNITIES ARE AVAILABLE... BIPARTITE TALKS FAIL - BANK EMPLOYEES STRIKE ON 12.11.2014
GRANT OF CHILDREN EDUCATION ALLOWANCE TO 3RD CHILD - RAILWAY ORDER EXPECTED DA - AICPIN SIMPLE CALCULATOR

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

MODIFIED ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME (MACPS) FOR THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES



Government has notified the new ACP SCHEME for Central Government Employees as recommended by the Sixth Central Pay Commission...

The Scheme would be known as " MODIFIED ASSURED CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME (MACPS) FOR THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES.
The Government has considered the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission for introduction of a MACPS and has accepted the same with further modification to grant three financial upgradations under the MACPS at intervals of 10, 20 and 30 years of continuous regular service.

The scheme would be operational w.e.f. 01.09.2008. In other words, financial upgradations as per the provisions of the earlier ACP Scheme ( of August, 1999) would be granted till 31.08.2008.

Click to view the O.M.

59 comments:

Anonymous said...

the MACP scheme seems to be discouraging to most of the employees. in my case, I have fixed in the grade pay of 4200=00 and next promotional grade pay in my hierarchy is 5400=00. that means I would get my promotional grade pay after putting 30 years of service as the promotional avenue is very feeble and next grade pays are 4600=, 4800=00 and then 5400=00.

Anonymous said...

Kindly let us know the grade pay of Steno-D(old scale 4000, present grade pay 2400)as per MACP schme. It seems 2800, but we expectd 4200 (our next promotional grade is Steno C and the present grade pay of steno c is 4200)

Anonymous said...

The new MACP sheme has rationalised and addressed some long standing issues like ACP to Group A officer and next grade pay in the pay band formula,which rationally gives next grade pay to all employees irrespective of the next higher post in the pay scale because for many posts the next higher promotional post matches with the next grade pay. Now these majority group of employees will not suffer just because and not due to their own fault that organisation does not have two grade pay up for next post.All officer in the grade pay of 4200/- will get now next grade pay of 4600/- only irrespective of the fact of the grade pay of the next higher post in promotion. It is not my fault that my org does not have 5400/- grade pay for the next post and I should not be deprived for that as in some org after serving same yrs ( 10 yrs ) in same post, he or she will get 5400/.

Anonymous said...

The MACP has not provided any respite to some of the staff stagnating in the same payscale for more than 25 years. In my case I joined Givt.service in 1976 and was promoted in 1983. There after no promotion till 1993. In 93 I was offered promotion but due to some constraints I could not accept the prmotion for change of Hqrs. I was denied 2nd ACP for this reason However the ACP scheme was introduced in 1999. Now the MACP has also kept the same clause. Have I to retire without any financial benifit after working in the same post for more than 28 years?

ashwani said...

A big joke with employees in 6500-10500 grade?

Anonymous said...

6th CPC is effected from 1.1.06 but MACP will be operated from 1.9.08.Is it not a big joke? For this reason many employee will not get financial benefit. More over it is announcing after elction.Recent retired Employees are very disheartened.

NITIN said...

kindly let us know what the pay band for sr. clerk of railway is going to be?

ayyalasomayajulamurali said...

Sir I am Murali from postal department class 3 Visakhpatnam I would like say what has achieved for this not know and no use there is huge discrimination for postal department class 3 .
1. The past services rendered Reserved trained poll class 3 in the department of posts ion entire India by nearly one lakh staff members who are victimized for hour wages just for Rs per hour not decided in the OM.
2. what scales for Indian postal class particular an unknown system of stream is going that is TBOP no where in any depart no body know whether it is for financial promotion what but according Madras HC it is financial up gradation not the promotions.
3.Several forced hidden doubts are also there.
4. Why some sector postal class3 without any service benefits are left alone Reserve staff means the staff meant for establish meant like regular employees like BSF CRPF ITBP are they not paid regular salary but we worked RS 2 hour for 8 years 1981 to 1988 though we have selected for direct quota on seeing paper advt we became most neglected Indian orphan the one sector of public members are thrown to bay of Bengal and human rights are rigidly placed to life time death sentence pl
pl provide equal human fundamental for all postal class 3 from 1981 along with other employee who selected for direct quot class3 1981 .
AYYALASOMAYAJULA MURALI
POSTAL ASSISTANT WALTAIR RS HO VISAKHPATNAM ANDHRAPRADESH MOBILE 09290016534 email id: murali_viswanadh@rediffmail.com

Anonymous said...

I am working in the grade pay of Rs.5400/- & completed ten years in this grade on 15/03/2007. Since MACP would be operational since 01/09/2008. Based on the MACP,
Whether I will get my due upgradation w.e.f 16/03/2007 on completion of ten years of regular service in a grade or w.e.f 01/09/2008

Anonymous said...

Sir, I M.Ramchandra, LDC in the I&B Ministry, Bangalore, appointed as LDC and Jointed on 10.03.1988. I-ACP was fixed from 10.03.2000 under the pay scale of Rs.4000 - 100 - 6000. As per VI-CPC, I was fixed Rs.2400/-. Now, I am eligible for II-ACP or not and which is my II-
ACP Grade Pay. Please clarify.

Anonymous said...

I am working as a Research Assistant in the scale of 6500-10500. I joined my Institute in October 1977 as a Technician & got promotion under DPC in October 1983. My Institute gave me the benefit of ACP in the year 2006 & consider the effect of the same from October 2001 after completion of 24 years. I completed thirty years in October 2007. As per 6th pay commission during 30 years of service, at least 3 promotions or ACP benefit is given to the central government employee. My ACP after completion of 30 years is due in October 2007.Since MACP would be operational since 01/09/2008. Based on the MACP, whether I will get my due
upgradation w.e.f 1/10/2007 on completion of thirty years of regular service or w.e.f 01/09/2008 & what will be my next grade pay ?

Anonymous said...

Dear Friends

This policy is made to make fool to the lower staff ,who could not get promtoion due to departmental faults. Due to tehcnical fault, department has failed to give promotion timely, employees will suffer. Simply a LDC has appointed in the grade of Rs.1900/-will be given grade Rs.2400/- (Old Rs.4000-6000) on promotion on completion of 8 years but inthis ACP scheme, 1st ACP he will gade pay of Rs.2000/- only after completion of ten years and he will suffer financial loss. hence it is very clear that this policy will increase disparity in the mind of low paid employees.

ASHOK KUMAR TANK said...

Dear Friends

This policy is made to make fool to the lower staff ,who could not get promtoion due to departmental faults. Due to tehcnical fault, department has failed to give promotion timely, employees will suffer. Simply a LDC has appointed in the grade of Rs.1900/-will be given grade Rs.2400/- (Old Rs.4000-6000) on promotion on completion of 8 years but inthis ACP scheme, 1st ACP he will gade pay of Rs.2000/- only after completion of ten years and he will suffer financial loss. hence it is very clear that this policy will increase disparity in the mind of low paid employees.

Anonymous said...

Due to educational qualification bar in recruitment rules many are debarred from acp. So what about the good chunk of employees who did not get even one promotion after 25 years of service ?

Anonymous said...

Hello my name is J P Shivhare.
my terms of service as on 1/9/2008 is of 25 years.
at present my grade pay is 2400
i want to know my new grade pay as per MACPS scheme.
thank you.

Anonymous said...

Hello my name is J P Shivhare.
my terms of service as on 1/9/2008 is of 25 years.in dept. of post.
at present my grade pay is 2400
i want to know my new grade pay as per MACPS scheme.
thank you.

my i d- shivhare.jp@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

All the group 'D'employees were upgraded in the grade pay of Rs. 1800/- from 1300/- or 1600/-. Now, what will be the next grade pay of those group 'D'employees who have served more then 25 years service even after getting two upgradatoins in previous ACP scheme, as all of his juniors are getting same grade pay and how it will count.

Anonymous said...

it is a blow on lower level employees particularly those who have got acp between 01.01.2006 to 31.08.2008 in my case i am an ldc and got 12 years acp in december 2007 i was given 2400 but as per new macp scheme if i would like to continue in 2400 grade i would have to loose pay commisson arrears of, it is a big lose lower clerical grade.

Anonymous said...

MACP is a big joke to the low paid employess. Government has made us foolsih. when a LDC is eligible for 2400 grade pay after getting his promotion, govt. is giving Grade pay of Rs.2000 after completion of 10 years. Old ACP is better than this MACP Scheme.
An LDC will get Gradepay of Rs.4200 after completion of 30 year almost retirment stage. In old ACP scheme after completing 24 year he was getting 4200 grade pay. It is better to withdraw MACP.

Rukman
CSWCRTI., Bellary

Anonymous said...

MACP is a big joke to the low paid employess. Government has made us foolsih. Rajasthan Government is giving 3 grade ACP on completion of 9,18 ^ 27 years in promotional scanes and central government is giving ACP on completion of 10,20 & 30 years.
There is no doubt this MACP scheme is should be withdrawn. A statement govenrment employees will be gde of 5400/- on completion of 30 years and central government employees will get only 4200/- in additional 3% promotion increment in every difference grade. Hence Rajasthan Govenment is better than central government.
In other words officers of central government has given more weighted after multiply of 1.85 their salary and they have given highly jumps of Rs.10,000/- in their grade pay.

Anonymous said...

Only one change should be made in New MACP Scheme, that is financial upgradation not once in ten years, once in six years.
It will be clear all problems...!

Anonymous said...

Instead of 12 and 24 years, MACP has given 10,20 and 30. Nowadays employees are joining at the age of above 30.Maximum period of 30 years only they will complete,so what is the benefit in this scheme..!
yes... Big Joke..!

Anonymous said...

MACP is a big cheat. As per old ACP, on completion of 12 years he is eligible for next promotional scale of pay. But as per MACP one has to wait 20 to 30 years to get the next promotional grade pay.
for eg. (1) LDC as per old ACP on completion of 12 years he will get UDC scale (2400 grade pay), but MACP he will get Rs. 2000 only. He has to wait another 10 years to get 2400 grade pay.
(2) Steno D 4000 scale,(Now getting 2400 grade pay. As per old ACP next steno C promotional scale is 6500 on completion of 12 years. But as per MACP he will be getting only 2800. He has to wait another 10 years to get 4200 grade pay.

My question is whether govt. will give option to employees to select MACP scheme on completion of 10 years or Old ACP schme on completion of 12 years.

with kind regards

Anonymous said...

hello , I am UDC in Delhi Govt as per previous scale and my date of joining as LDC is 1-09-1984 , will I be a candiddate of old ACP or Modified ACP

virat said...

Modified ACP scheme is a big joke on the word "ASSURED PROMOTION".

the ACP scheme itself was launched by 5th CPC with motive to compensate employees who didnt get regular promotion in their career.
the word ACP stands for 'Assured Career Promotion', n rationale of the scheme is that the CG employees shud get acp in case of not getting regular promotion (may b due to lack of vacancies in higher post in the deptt). so under the scheme, instead of getting the post of promotion in the hierarchy in department, he is supposed to b given the acp benefit in all aspects attached with that higher post, except for actual position/promotion attached to that post. such benefits include payscale/grade pay, etc.

now if, the MACP is accepted then, the concept of acp scheme itself gets derailed. examples of such derailment r like this.
1) inspectors of central excise getting 4200 gp, gets promotion to post of superintendent in gp of 4800. but under macp, inspectors not getting actual promotion, wud get macp benefit with gp of just 4600 n not that of promotional post.
2) similarly, inspectors getting acp/macp, without getting actual promotion in post of superintendent, is denied the benefit of financial upgradation to gp of 5400 even after completion of 4 years in gp of 4800.
now where is the rationale of giving him the ‘ASSURED” promotion under the macp scheme. when the word used is ‘assured promotion’, then he shud get the gp of promotional post (n not the intermediary gp of 4600). n if the acp inspectors completing 4 years of service r denied the gp 5400 then, or not getting gp of 4800 on macp, it implies that those inspectors hvnt got any ‘so-called’ assured promotion.

Accepting this macp scheme itself is an insult to the assured promotion. else, remove the word promotion from the said scheme.

all associations or anybody, plz get the same challenged in any forum like in CAT or even court of law.

Anonymous said...

Ijoined railways on 7.5.86. iI got 1st ACP on 1.10.99. And now I am working in pay band 4600/-. Now as per MACPS from which date I will get the next pay band which is 4800?

RAVINDRAN P said...

With regard to Group 'D' posts upgraded to Group 'C' w.e.f. 01.01.2006, the upgradation will not be treated as a promotion as per the earlier ACP Scheme. The Present MACP Scheme will not be different from the same. Hence, an employee drawing a Grade Pay of RS. 1800 (after upgardation) will be granted the I ACP upgradation to the Grade Pay of Rs. 1900, II ACP upgradtion to Rs. 2000 and III ACP upgradation to Rs. 2400 after 10, 20 & 30 years service respectively or 10 years from the first and/or second promotion, whichever is earlier.

Ravindran said...

Most of the comments here are actually related to MACP are regarding the question of 'hierarchy' or the Channel of ACP upgradations. The change in the Scheme is not a new thing. The modalities of the new scheme was decided by the Govt right when it decided on implementation of the 6 CPC recommendations. All the Federation/Unions were very much aware of the same. For a change in the new scheme, kindly approach your respective Association/Unions to do the needful.

Ravindran P, Ordnance Factory, Tiruchrapalli

E-mail: ravipayangot@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

Please refer to the Clarification 2 & 6 of the OM dated 13th September, 2008 by Ministry of Finance for Pay Fixation. There, the Ministry clearly state that both for Promotion and Financial upgradation under ACP, Pay is fixed in the higher post only (Hierarchy in the Post not in the grade pay).

virat said...

to anonymous dt.26.5 at 6.34 pm.

clarification 2 & 6 of the OM dt 13.9.08 refers to acp n not abt macp. so that clarification appears to hv become redundent after 1.9.2008 the date of implementation of macp.

PRAKASH said...

this is prakash JE IN cpwd alappuzha

i think by the name it states dat it is giving a career progression bcz of not geting the transfer in time ... no the 6 cpc challenged this carreer progression i mean the basic aim of the so called acp .. now he cant say modified .. that word is meaningless he entirely changed the structure by just givin financial upgradation .... therwise the DOPT should clarify the aim and concept... hope dat this matter will get much attention .....

Ravindran said...

One issue which needs clarification in the new MACP Scheme is regarding the conditions for eligibility of upgradation under the new scheme. In the original ACP Scheme, upgradations to the next pay scale in the heirarchy of the employee were granted only if the employee satisfies the conditions applicable for regular promotions vis-a-vis educational qualifications, residency period, DPC etc. Now the Govt has stated that upgradations under the new MACP Scheme shall be made only to the next Grade Pay in the common grade structure mentioned in the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008. Now the question is, what will be the eligibility conditions for grant of financial upgradations under the new MACP Scheme, which is not made to the grade applicable to regular promotions? Will it be fair to expect a person to satisfy the conditions applicable for grant of promotions to a post holding higher grade pay than the grade pay to which he is upgraded?

May someone help the Govt to see reason.

verma R K said...

MACP is a big joke to the Draughtsman Gr-1,Gr-2And GR-3 employess. Government has made us foolsih. when a J.E. is eligible for 5400 grade pay after getting his a.c.promotion,&6600after2nd acp But Draughtsman Gr-1 is getting grade pay4200.
I joined cpwdin 26.6.1981as a Draughtsman Gr-3 in 4000 old scale
i was prmote as Draughtsman GR-2 in.9.2.1991in 5000-8000 old scale
iwas promote as Draughtsman GR-1 in.01.12.2005in 5500-9000 old scale
please tell me whate is my grade .
now i an getting 4200 grade pay
whatis my grade pay after icompletd 30year.

http://gnctdss.daswa.blogspot.com said...

Steno-D expected grade pay on MACP as 4200 but it seems next2800 our next promotional grade is Steno C for which it is 4200. Most of the litigation in 5cpc was from Grade-II class of employees again the same is being invited. What the anomaly committee has done. why the MACP is not giving on the basis of hierarchy of posts available in the organisation. Lets do something on it.

Anonymous said...

AN EMPLOYEE APPOINTED IN THE YEAR 1985 IS ELIGIBLE FOR 2ND ACP ON COMPLETION OF 24 YRS OF SERVICE AND HE WILL BE GETTING GRADE PAY ON THE BASIS OF HIERARCHY OF POSTS AVAILABLE IN THE ORGANISATION. ANOTHER EMPLOYEE APPOINTED IN THE SAME POST IN THE YEAR 1985 (AFTER SEPT) WILL BE ELIGIBLE FOR SECOND UPGRADATION UNDER MACPS AND HE WILL BE GETTING HIGHER GRADE PAY IN THE HIERARCHY OF SCALE. IS THIS NOT A JOKE? AT THE SAME TIME THE EMPLOYEE WHO JOINED SERVE IN THE YEAR 1985 (BEFORE SEPT) WILL BE ELIGIBLE FOR THIRD UPGRADATION AS PER MACP. WHY THIS ANOMALY. AS THE SAID PROPOSAL WAS APPROVED BY THE 6TH CPC UNIONS SHOULD HAVE TAKEN UP THE MATTER WITH THE MINISTRY AT APPROPRIATE TIME. HOPE UNIONS WILL TAKE THIS ISSUE WITH THE GOVT.

Anonymous said...

myself shri.v.d.gaikwad, working in ministry of agriculture in gp 5400/-. I was ainitially appointed in central government service in the year 1975 in then 330-560 scale.further i was selected to another post in then scale of 425-700, in same organisation.later on IV th pay commission revised this scale as 1400-2300.in the year 1987 I was promoted to the then scale of 1640-2900.further I got selected for the higher post through UPSC the then scale of 2000-3500 in the year 1988.further I was promoted to post carrying the then scale of 2200-4000 in the year 1992.Since then I am in the same scale.Mean while V th pay commission in year 1996 has revised/ as wel as upgraded the certain scales as follows.
1400-2300 5000-8000
1640-2900 5500-9000
2000-3500 6500-10500
2200-4000 8000-13500
Now VI th pay commission has merged the certain scales with Grade pay of 4200/- for which I received promotion and also I was selected through UPSC. Now I seek the clarification from somebody that
(1) In accordance with point 9 of Annexure I of MACPS my service before my selection in 1988 will be counted for macps.(Since selection was for new post carrying the same grade pay i.e. 4200/-)
(2) In accordance with point 5 of MACPS the promotions awarded before 1-1-2006, will be ignored, (especially where the scales are merged by the V th pay commission i.e.5000-8000, 5500-9000, and 6500-10500.)
(3) Will the MACPS be allowed to me. Iam going to retire by 2010.

Anonymous said...

I was appointed as LDC on 14.08.1984. I got first promotion as Auditor in 1989, after passing Departmental Exam and promoted as Section Officer 29/7/1993 after passing the SOG Exam and thereafter as Asstt. Audit Officer on 30.07.1996. Now these two scale are merged with single grade pay of Rs. 4800/- as per 6th CPC. My question is when I have completed 16 years in one grade then I am entitled to get any finacial upgradation ? If so, when ?

Anonymous said...

whether SOGE passed staff (auditor,sr.auditor etc) promoted to SO(A)/SO(Acc) be treated as normal departmental promotion

Deepak said...

I have joined service in JUNE-1990 --Till date i have not get any ACP, Because ACP are banned in our department [AIR & Doordarshan] due to a upgrade scale was given ie from Rs 4000/ to Rs 4500/-- in the year 1996 ,Now our department are lift that ban and allowing to give MACP,Kindly tell me can i elgible for ACP and MACP

Anonymous said...

ALL INDIA AUDIT & ACCOUNTS ASSOCIATION
AUDIT LEKHA BHAWAN
15/1089-90, VASUNDHARA, VASUNDHARA (P.O.), Dt. GHAZIABAD (U.P),
PIN-201012
Ph: 0120-2881727/4101593/ 0 – 98681 45667
E-mail: auditflag1923@gmail.com
Website: www.auditflag.blogspot.com
Reference: AIA/Circular-11/2009 Date: 24th April 2009

To
Unit Secretaries,
Members of Women's Committee &
Members & Spl. Invitees – NE


Dear Comrades,
In the bilateral meeting on 20th April 2009 with Principal Director, Staff, the following issues were also discussed – rather certain clarifications and some amendments/improvements to the scheme of adhoc SO were sought - to in addition to the agenda items as given in the Circular 10.

Two of such issues were related to transfer of SOGE Civil Audit passed candidates from A&E office to Civil Audit offices.

Some units have reported that there are some candidates in A&E offices who opted for SOGE Civil Audit only because there was no chance for any career advancement in A&E offices. Some of them have passed the papers of SOGE Accounts. Under the scheme given vide circular dated 25th March 2009 by CAG, these personnel would not be considered for adhoc promotion because they are candidates for SOGE Civil Audit. It was also pointed out that some candidates, as in the office of AG (A&E), AP, Hyderabad, had represented way back in 2007 for being considered/declared as SOGE Accounts passed and their representation is still pending.
We requested that relaxation to this clause may be given and a fresh option may be given to all such personnel to remain in A&E office itself, ie to withdraw from SOGE Civil Audit and considered as SOGE Accounts passed.
It was stated by Pr Director Staff that at this stage no such request could be considered. On being further requested it was stated that any request for relaxation can be considered after the implementation of the scheme.

We also took up the issue of taking SOGE Civil Audit passed candidates from A&E offices in Audit offices where vacancies in the SO/AAO cadre are limited or marginal.
It was clarified that (P)AG (Audit) has to work out how many posts will be required to accommodate all such SOGE civil audit passed personnel and have to seek sanction for additional posts. It was further clarified that all such candidates from A&E offices would be taken on deputation against additional posts, without affecting the promotional prospects of future candidates in Civil Audit offices.

Another issue we raised was on the regularisation of daily wage employees. We were informed by Pr Director, Staff some scheme is being worked out and it is expected that we can expect some action in this regard soon.

With greetings,
Yours fraternally


(M. S. Raja)
Secretary General

Anonymous said...

MACP is MURDER of ACP scheme

Anonymous said...

In case of planning Asst. of DDA, a planning draughtman after 24 years of service in the previous ACP scheme would be in the GP of 5400and PB-3B, but now in MACP schemehe will only get GP of 4800 in PB-2,so where is the uniform progression and where is the so called upgradation of the employees.

frequentmale said...

ye MACP kewal bevkoof ( fool ) banane ki scheeme hai...jo lowar cadre ka staff 24 saal ki service poori karne ke baad 4200 grade pay ki ummeed kar raha tha...usko is MACP ke dwara kewal 2800 grade pay hi milegi....jub ki purane scale ke anusar wo 4200 per pahunch chuka hai..

isko theek karna jaroori hai.


kisi bhi employee ko old scale se neechhe nahi laya jana chahiye...

Architecture&Interiors said...

WE R IN THE CADRE OF 6500-10500 AS PER PREVIOUS SCALES. AFTER COMPLETING 24 YRS WE WERE TO GET SCALE OF 10000 WHICH COMES NOW UNDER PB3, BUT ACCORDING TO MACP, AFTER 20 YEARS OUR PAYBAND WILL BE SAME (PB2) AND THERE WILL BE CHANGE OF GRADE PAY ie FROM 4600 TO 4800. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS ORDER SINCE ONE YEAR & NOW WE ARE SHOCKED TO HAVE IT, THAT AFTER WAITING 20-22 YEARS WILL WE BE GETTING ONLY RS. 200 HIKE? THIS IS TOTAL INJUSTICE TO CLASS 'C'& 'D' CADRES. ITS REALY PATHETIC THAT OUR DEDUCTION FOR CGHS GAS ALREADY BEEN RAISED TO RS 325 INSTEAD OF 100. EVERY MONTH GOVT IS CHARGING 325 FOR CGHS & HIKE WILL ONLY BE 200 PER YEAR. GOD SAVE US. MORE OVER ALL THE SHOCKING ORDERS WERE POSTPONED TO BE RELEASED AFTER ELECTION. DOPT MAY PLEASE HELP US.

Architecture&Interiors said...

its really very sad that we joined as group c cadre & will be retired in group c only.PAY COMISSIONS ARE THERE FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EMPLOYEES BUT IN THIS MACP WE VE GONE BACKWARDS . WE ARE NT HAVING ANY BENEFIT . PREVIOUS ACP WAS COMPARITIVELY 100 TIMES BETTER. WE R IN SCALE OF 6500-10000. WE WERE TO GET ACP IN 24 YEARS, BUT ACCORDING TO MACP AFTER 20 YEARS WE ILL BE GETTING ONLY CHANGE IN GRADE PAY WHICH IS NOT WORTH, ITS ONLY A EYE WASH FOR GOVT EMPLOYEES, MAJOR BENEFIT IS AMONGST GROUP A CARE.

Adarsh said...

i have been appointed in 01/1987 and got my first promotion in 01/1990. in macps whether i would get next financial upgradation w.e.f. 01/2000 OR from 1.9.2008. please clarify

Anonymous said...

MACPS= MODIFIED AGONISING CAREER PROGRESSION SCHEME FOR EMPLOYEES BELOW THE GRADE PAY OF 4200

Anonymous said...

Even after 50 years of independence, the vestiges of British rule cannot be erased from the civilian bureaucracy. It is with great anguish we pour our feelings out, and hope that the highest level of the political leadership considers it sympathetically and avoid any inaction by vested bureacratic interests.
The non-class 1 i.e the Group B,C are an aggrieved lot.
The classification of the services under Gazetted-non-Gazetted , Group A, B and C has created a virtual Aparthied like situation wherein we come across cases of Group A officers having a disdainful and supercilious attitude towards their non UPSC, Non Class 1 subordinates bordering on hubris.What is so sacrosanct about this classification that it is leads to vested interests protecting their turfs and how can you have social justice in society when the civil service itself has such an inegalitarian hierarchal structure that it it in danger of falling apart if any other formation based on social justice platform like Mayawati comes to power at the centre. Before we go public on this issue, I suggest that the Govt.
act on it and take some remedial measure before any social upheavel shakes up the very citadels of our bureaucracy.
This has assumed such an Institutionalized setup that it almost mirrors the varna system in Hinduism.
Everything is based strictly on hierarchy and not on value.The hiatus is too wide to bridge, given the sacrosanct nature of Group A.
How sacrosanct the Class 1 scales in the sixth Pay Commission are, can be gauged by the substantial jump in some allowances and perks in the Grade Pay of Rs 5400/ and PB-3 and the virtual red letter highlights in PB-3
as 'Group A induction'.
Lack of any lateral upward moves on the part of the lesser
mortals to move up the Varna system, which euphemistically is
referred to as Induction in group A, and which is tantamount to a lower varna person being baptised into a higher one, has created a deep resentment in many talented employees who by virtue of bad luck could not make through UPSC and had to opt for SSC instead.This system,like the caste system, is designed in such a way that it precludes any latent talent in the lower rungs.
Probably no other Instituition has this kind of divergence
wherein a certain class of people are condemneded to stagnation for the rest of their lives ,however talented they may be.
As a first step towards alleviating this historical wrongs,
the Govt can make towards abolishing this classification into A,B,C,D and gazetted.Also any graduate in Govt. service in whatever grade pay should be made to appear for an exam and given an opportunity to get the Grade pay of Rs 5400/ after he clears certains minimum criteria in a transparent manner.
It is never too late in History to correct a wrong.
Some of the privileges enjoyed by the higher echelons like
unquestioned study leave, can also be extended to all sections
as everyone can justify value addition after taking a
sabbatical off for education. I dont see any reasons why
a non -gazetted employee who has put in 20 years service
should be denied permission for a 2 year study leave, on loss of pay. Why cant you frame rules on this.
Secondly as the recommendations of the Chairman of the Commission do carry some weight, I suggest that keeping the egalitarian nature of our Constitution in mind kindly keep the ratio of the Highest vs the lowest pay at the ratio of the fourth pay Commission.
Thirdly , there should be scope for lateral or upwardly induction of exceptionally talented staff from non group A ,who by virtue of mischance might not have fared well in the UPSC civil services examination and who are condemned to stagnation for the rest of their lives.This will address to a great extent the frustration and resentment in them.
Start the process right away, or else the fight on this logic will be conducted in the next Administration and already some important social justice politicians are being sounded on it. Please do not take it lightly.

Anonymous said...

I Joined the I.T. Deptt as UDC in 1993 and was promoted as TA & STA on 8/7/1997 & 20/7/2001 respectively. In June, 2007 I was promoted as Inspector of Income-tax. Since Pay scale of STA & ITI is the same, am I entitled to any benefit under MACPS or otherwise.
Please clarfy. - Jag Mal Singh, Meerut

GSN said...

Sir,

I have joined service in may 87 in the scale of 4000-6000

I got 5000-8000 scale under OLD ACP in Aug 99,

I got New Appointment to the Scle 5500-9000 as a departmental candidate in Jul 2007.

Again I got another new appointment to the scale 5500-9000 as a dept candidate
in May 2009.

All my above appontments are in continues service.

What would be my grade pay now in Sep 2009 under MACP?

please mail to gsnsarma@yahoo.com

Anonymous said...

whether there is any possibility for the Govt. to issue subsequent revised order of MACP for promotional gradepay in the hierarchy in stead of hierarchy grade pay. Can anybody say?

Anonymous said...

when will a candidate with the following details get MACP
joined ldc 1.7.190
promoted as accountant 1.8.1981
promotd as senior accountant 1.4.1986
when do he get MACP ?

rao said...

is there any condition in MACP orders that one should complete 30 years of service for III MACP though he completed 25 years in the same cadre?

rajkumar said...

In survey of India I joined as TTT’B’ D/Man from 15.10.1984 in scale 260-400 after two years of training I got classified as D/Man Gde-IV in pay scale 975- (4th CPC) on 1.1.87 and after three years i.e. from 1.1.90 I got classified as D/Man Gde-III in pay scale of Rs. 1200…. (scale of UDC 4th CPC) and thereafter two years in Gde-III i.e. from1.1.1992, I got classified as D/Man Gde-II in the pay scale of Rs. 1350-2200 (scale of 4th CPC). Gde-II is the bench mark for counting the date for coming PROMOTION. I got Ist ACP from the date of Gde-II on 1.1.2004 after completion of 12 years. I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE 2ND ACP TO ME AS PER NEWLY DECLARED MACP SCHEME, WHEN WILL IT I GOT GRANTED? LIKELY SAME FOR 3RD ACP. MY DATE OF BIRTH IS 1.6.1960.

Anonymous said...

News:- Recently I saw a vacancy for LDC on SSC site which is earlier metric level but recently upgraded into 10+2 level.
Comment:- After VI CPC the qualification for Peon/Record Clerk etc is metric
and the grade pay for this post is 1800/- but after 10+2 a candidate qualify
the SSC they are lapsed three to four years of his life and get Rs. 1900/- GP
and a gift of many works like as UDC, Accountant, Auditor, Sr. Accountant,
Sr. Auditor with free mental tension. But a person recruits as a Record Clerk/Peon
(after completion of a commission for this as SAM, DAM, DAND, BHED) they get No tension only gives tension
and get GP Rs. 1800/-+ Liveries which is excess than GP of 1900/- and save her lives three to
four years and they get three to four increments up to a candidates complete 10+2 and SSC which is to more
than which a fresh LDC gets.
So I suggest to a candidate not to take admission in 10+2 if their motive to serve govt sector(as LDC), they only
aimed to SAM, DAM, DAND, BHED niti for geting Service in govt sectore after 10th.

s a marathe said...

1.A postman is not ready to work as sorting postman and so declined earlier BCR with grade pay 2800(before 01.09.2008). Hence what will be his position in MACP with effect from 01.09.2008?
2. A postal assistant declined LSG(NB) before 01.09.2008 for first time an d for second time declined in year 2009. As he has completed his thirty years of service is he eligible for third MACP with effect from 01.09.2008 ? kindly reply as soon as possible...

Anonymous said...

I am a group B officer falling under MACPS. Does MACPS deny me a promotion review before 10 years? Or does MACPS say that promotion should happen only every 10 years?

darshan said...

Please advice me whether I am eligible for modified Assured Career Progression scheme(MACPS) with the following details:-

I have been appointed in Indo-Tibetan Border Police( Para Military, MHA as Sub-Inspector under direct recruitment on 23.1.1988 at pay scale 1400-1800-2300

Departmental promotion as Inspector on 25.6.1992 at pay scale 1640/-

This scale was upgraded to 6500-200-10500 w.e.f. 1.1.96 due to 5th CPC recommended under ACP scheme I have not recieved ACP due to Medical low category.

My grade pay has been fixed as 4600/- w.e.f. 1.1.2006

Now question is

1. How many MACP will be given to me.

2. Salary fixed after MACP.

Please forward your reply on my email id darshansinghpaul@rediffmail.com

sukhen dey said...

Dear Friends

This policy is made to make fool to the lower staff ,who could not get promtoion due to departmental faults. Due to tehcnical fault, department has failed to give promotion timely, employees will suffer. Simply a LDC has appointed in the grade of Rs.1900/-will be given grade Rs.2400/- (Old Rs.4000-6000) on promotion on completion of 8 years but inthis ACP scheme, 1st ACP he will gade pay of Rs.2000/- only after completion of ten years and he will suffer financial loss. hence it is very clear that this policy will increase disparity in the mind of low paid employees.

Sukhen Dey


Rates of Dearness Allowance & Finmin Orders for DA, DR & 5th CPC

DA & DR ORDERS - EXPECTED DA STATUS
Effective DatesAdditional DA Total DA DA OrdersDR Orders5th CPC
1.1.2006 0-DA/DR
1.7.2006 2%2%29.08.2008DA/DR
1.1.2007 4%6%29.08.2008DA/DR
1.7.2007 3%9%29.08.2008DA/DR
1.1.2008 3%12%29.08.2008DA/DR
1.7.2008 4%16%29.08.2008DA/DR
1.1.2009 6%22%13.03.200927.03.2009DA/DR
1.7.2009 5%27%18.09.200929.09.2009DA/DR
1.1.2010 8%35%26.03.201031.03.2010DA/DR
1.7.2010 10%45%22.09.201029.09.2010DA/DR
1.1.2011 6%51%24.03.201129.03.2011DA/DR
1.7.2011 7%58%03.09.2011 05.10.2011DA/DR
1.1.2012 7%65%03.04.2012 04.04.2012DA/DR
1.7.2012 7%72%28.09.2012 25.10.2012DA/DR
1.1.2013 8%80%25.04.2013 02.05.2013DA/DR
1.7.2013 10%90%25.09.2013 03.10.2013DA/DR
1.1.2014 10%100%27.03.201409.04.2014DA/DR
EXPECTED DA JUL 14 - JANUARY STATUS EXPECTED DA JUL 14 - FEBRUARY STATUSEXPECTED DA JUL 14 - MARCH STATUSEXPECTED DA JUL 14 - APRIL STATUSEXPECTED DA JUL 14 - MAY STATUS

LIST OF CGHS HOSPITALS

1. ALLAHABAD 2. AHEMDABAD 3. Bangalore 4. Bhubhaneshwar 5. Bhopal
6. Chandigarh 7. CHENNAI 8. Delhi 9. Dehradun 10. Guwahati
11. Hyderabad 12. Jaipur 13. Jabalpur 14. Kanpur 15. Kolkata
16. Lucknow 17. Meerut 18. Mumbai 19. Nagpur 20. Patna
21. Pune 22. Ranchi 23. Shillong 24. Trivandrum 25. Jammu.

TA / DA RULES

TRAVELLING ALLOWANCE ORDERS
Rates of Daily Allowance-Finmin23.09.2008
Travel Entitlements - Finmin23.09.2008
Finmin orders on TA22.01.2009
Finmin Clarification on TA18.02.2009
IT Relaxation on TA04.03.2009
TA on Retirement11.04.2009
Travel Entitlements on Transfer08.06.2010
Finmin orders on TA/DA11.06.2010
Journey on Transfer30.12.2010
Finmin Orders on TA24.01.2011
TA/DA on Permanent Transfer01.02.2011
Different types of TA27.04.2011
Definition of Travelling Expenses02.06.2011
Railway Clarification TA on Transfer16.08.2011
Finmin Clarification on TA01.08.2012
CGDA Clarification on TA 'A' Cities08.01.2013
Travelling Allowances for Medical Treatment10.05.2013
Railway Clarification on TA/DA12.08.2013

7th CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION NEWS

TITLEDATEARTICLESORDERS
7TH CPC REPORT AND THE NEED FOR TIMELINESS16.04.20147thCPC Blog
DID YOU KNOW HOW THE 6TH CPC MULTIPLICATION FACTOR OF 1.86 WAS DERIVED..?15.04.201490Paisa
EXPECTED PAY STRUCTURE OF 7TH CPC10.04.201490Paisa
Date of submission of 7th CPC Report05.04.2014-Rajya Sabha
Comments and Suggestions on 7th CPC04.04.201490Paisa
A webpage has been created by the Ministry of Finance for 7th Central Pay Commission24.03.2014-Finmin
Federations veiws on the ToR of 7th CPC05.03.2014AIRF/BPMS/IRTSA
Cabinet approved 7th Central Pay Commission Terms of Reference28.02.201490Paisa
Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission04.02.201490Paisa
NO COMPROMISE ON TERMS OF REFERENCE07.12.2013NFPE
Possible ToR meeting with Staff Side JCM-Dopt19.11.2013Dopt
7th CPC Date for implementation11.10.20137thcpcnews
Press Statement of Confederation of 7th CPC25.09.2013Confederation
Consent given by PM for 7th CPC25.09.201390Paisa

RETIREMENT AGE 62

J&K Employees Retirement Age hiked to 60, on par with Central Government Staff11.04.201490Paisa
Retirement age of 65: The Politicization of Employees’ Demands11.04.201490Paisa
Retirement age to 62-What is the background behind this news?01.03.201490Paisa
Retirement Age 62 - Cabinet expected to clear on Friday (28.202014)26.02.201490Paisa
Retirement age 62 – No hike in Retirement age of Central Government employees…15.08.2013CGEN.in
Retirement Age 62 - Prime Minister likely to declare on his Independence Day speech14.08.2013CGEN.in
Retirement Age of High Court Judges23.08.201390Paisa
No proposal to enhance the retirement age from 60 to 62 years08.03.201390Paisa
Retirement age of Central Government Employees20.01.201390Paisa
Retirement age of faculty doctors from 65 to 70 years…03.12.201290Paisa
Enhancement of superannuation retirement age of KV teachers31.08.201290Paisa
Retirement age of Teachers and Lecturers26.08.201290Paisa

LDC - UDC ISSUES...

LDC-UDC GRADE PAY ISSUE
SUBJECTDATEDOWNLOAD
UPGRADATION OF GRADE PAY OF LDC & UDC - YET ANOTHER CASE IS FILED.31.03.2014AIAMSHQ
LDC-UDC Issue : Case Filed for Grade Pay 2400 to LDC27.03.2014AIAMSHQ
Upgradation Pay Scale to Railway Accounts Staff w.e.f. 1/1/1 996 on actual basis – NFIR19.03.2014NFIR
Demanding upgradation of the grade pay of LDC & UDC to Rs. 2400 & 2800 – Letter forward to MOSPI26.02.2014AIAMSHQ
LDC-UDC ISSUE-YET ANOTHER LETTER FROM DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE03.02.2014AIAMSHQ
LDC-UDC ISSUE: TOWARDS A FINAL ACTION14.01.2014AIAMSHQ
TOWARDS A FINAL ACTION ON LDC & UDC GRADE PAY ISSUE…31.12.2013AIAMSHQ
LDC-UDC ISSUE: A STEP FORWARD04.12.2013AIAMSHQ
Deputy Secretary JCA writes to Under Secretary CS-II, DoPT13.11.2013AIAMSHQ
CONFEDERATION WRITES TO GOVERNMENT ON LDC- UDC PAY SCALE ANOMALY26.10.2013CONFEDERATION
CASE RETURNED BY THE DOPT & DIRECTED TO TAKE UP THE MATTER DIRECTLY WITH DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE, MOF.07.10.2013AIAMSHQ
LDC-UDC ISSUE-LETTER TO NAC MEMBERS10.09.2013AIAMSHQ
LDC-UDC Issue -Letter sent to the PM forwarded to JCA for action23.08.2013AIAMSHQ
And more news...

NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE MEETING DETAILS...

NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE - DECSIONS & DISCUSSIONS AND MINUTES & RESULTS
PROMOTIONAL SCHEMES ACP MACP
DESCRIPTION STAFF SIDE OFFICIAL SIDE
SETTING UP OF NAC 12.01.2009
COMPOSITION OF NAC 05.02.2009
EXTENSION OF NAC 01.07.2010
1st NAC MEETING(12.12.2009) 08.02.2010
2nd NAC MEETING(27.03.2010) AIRF//NFIR 04.05.2010
3rd NAC MEETING(15.02.2011) AIRF/CONF 21.04.2011
4th NAC MEETING(05.01.2012) AIANGO//AIRF 05.01.2012
5th NAC MEETING(17.07.2012) NFIR//NFIR 13.09.2012
MACP MEETING NFIR/ 03.05.2010
2nd MACP MEETING(15.09.2010) CONF/AIRF 06.10.2010
3rd MACP MEETING(15.03.2011) CONF 20.04.2011
4th MACP MEETING(27.07.2012) NFIR/CONF/IRTSA/INDWF/NFIR 13.09.2012
NATIONAL COUNCIL JCM (15.05.2010) NFPE/BPMS 07.07.2010
AGENDA ITEMS AIRF2011/AIRF2012 17.01.2011
INCREMENT ISSUE SETTLED 05.01.2012 19.03.2012
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS NAC/MACP NAC/MACP

Disclaimer

90 Paisa News : As and when orders amending the rules are published by the Government, the amendment orders will be published in our blog immediately. Readers are requested to refer to the source link is given at the end of the post.

All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. 90paisa accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog.


Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only.

90paisa is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Any suggestions write to us
90paisa2008@gmail.com


Related Posts with Thumbnails